| [2018] FWCA 6431 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Viva Energy Refining Pty Ltd
(AG2018/2649)
VIVA ENERGY REFINING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018 - GEELONG OPERATOR EMPLOYEES
Oil and gas industry | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 17 OCTOBER 2018 |
Application for approval of the Viva Energy Refining Enterprise Agreement 2018 - Geelong Operator Employees.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Viva Energy Refining Enterprise Agreement 2018 - Geelong Operator Employees (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Viva Energy Refining Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 October 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 June 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE500483 PR701430>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Viva Energy Refining Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 6431
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 6431
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues revolved around the interpretation of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically the criteria for determining whether an enterprise agreement is "simple" or "low-paid." The Commission considered the provisions of the agreement and the nature of the employees' roles. The Commission noted that the Geelong Operator employees were skilled and performed duties that required significant technical knowledge and experience. The Commission held that the roles were not low-paid, as the employees were compensated above the low-paid threshold. Additionally, the agreement contained provisions that went beyond the "simple" criteria, such as those addressing specific operational requirements and dispute resolution mechanisms.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the agreement was not a low-paid enterprise agreement due to the skilled nature of the Geelong Operator employees and their remuneration. The Commission also found that the agreement did not meet the criteria for a simple enterprise agreement because it included detailed provisions beyond what was considered "simple." Consequently, the Commission concluded that the agreement must be approved through the standard enterprise agreement process. The Commission certified the agreement under the standard enterprise agreement process, requiring further steps such as bargaining and negotiation before final approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.