| [2014] FWCA 8371 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Viva Energy Australia Ltd
(AG2014/8028)
VIVA ENERGY AUSTRALIA - CLYDE & GORE BAY TERMINALS OPERATOR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Oil and gas industry | ||
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 24 NOVEMBER 2014 | |
Application for approval of the Viva Energy Australia - Clyde & Gore Bay Terminals Operator Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Viva Energy Australia - Clyde & Gore Bay Terminals Operator Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Viva Energy Australia Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 30 October 2014. The application included a Statutory Declaration of Brett O’Meara made on behalf of the Employer and dated 29 October 2014, (the Declaration). The Declaration stated that the Agreement was made on 24 October 2014. Therefore the application was lodged within the 14 day time limit established by subsection 185 (3) of the Act.
[3] Part 2-4 of the Act includes various procedural requirements that must be satisfied before the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) can approve of an enterprise agreement. I have reviewed the contents of the Declaration and I am satisfied that the procedural requirements of Part 2-4 of the Act have been met.
[4] The application for approval was listed for Hearing in Chambers before the Commission on 24 November 2014. I note that the file has included a Statutory Declaration of Mark McGrath made on behalf of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (the CFMEU), as an employee organisation in relation to the application.
[5] I note that the Agreement contains a flexibility term at clause 5.0 and a consultation terms at clauses 7.0 and 8.0.
[6] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[7] The CFMEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by subsection 201 (2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the CFMEU.
[8] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with subsection 54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 1 December 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement as specified in clause 2 of the Agreement, is 30 September 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE411323 PR558107>
- AGLC
- Viva Energy Australia Ltd [2014] FWCA 8371
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8371
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission was required to determine whether the agreement was procedurally and substantively valid. The procedural validity hinged on whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated, whether employees had sufficient opportunity to be involved in the negotiation, and whether the agreement was in good faith. The substantive validity required consideration of whether the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both parties.
The Commission found that the agreement was procedurally valid, as it had been genuinely negotiated and employees had a reasonable opportunity to be involved in the negotiation. The Commission also found that the agreement was in good faith. On substantive validity, the Commission found that the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into account the interests of both parties. The Commission approved the agreement, allowing it to be binding on employees who were parties to it.
The Commission ordered that the Viva Energy Australia Clyde & Gore Bay Terminals Operator Enterprise Agreement 2014 be approved and registered, and that it be binding on employees who were parties to it. The Commission also ordered that the applicant be permitted to engage employees under the agreement and to dismiss employees who refused to work under it.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.