Viridian Glass Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2022] FWC 2384
•8 SEPTEMBER 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Viridian Glass Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 2384
[2022] FWC 2384
8 SEPTEMBER 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the recent matter of Viridian Glass Pty Ltd, the Fair Work Commission was called upon to assess the approval of the 2022 Newcastle Enterprise Agreement. The application was made by the employer, Viridian Glass Pty Ltd, seeking the Commission's endorsement of the agreement. The nature of the dispute involved whether the agreement was genuinely agreed upon by the parties and whether it met the better off overall test.
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was genuinely a product of genuine agreement and whether it satisfied the statutory criteria for approval. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement was genuinely agreed upon by the employer and the employees, and if the agreement provided a better overall outcome for the employees compared to the applicable award or other relevant agreements. Under section 186(2)(a) of the Fair Work Act, the Commission found that the agreement was not genuinely agreed upon.
The Commission's reasoning was grounded in the procedural flaws in the agreement process, which undermined the genuineness of the agreement. The employer had failed to ensure that the agreement was discussed with the relevant employees and that there was sufficient consultation. Consequently, the Commission concluded that the agreement did not genuinely reflect the consensus of the employees. As a result, the application for approval was dismissed, and the agreement was not endorsed.
No further orders were made in light of the dismissal, leaving the employer to revisit the process of negotiating a genuinely agreed-upon enterprise agreement with the employees.
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was genuinely a product of genuine agreement and whether it satisfied the statutory criteria for approval. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement was genuinely agreed upon by the employer and the employees, and if the agreement provided a better overall outcome for the employees compared to the applicable award or other relevant agreements. Under section 186(2)(a) of the Fair Work Act, the Commission found that the agreement was not genuinely agreed upon.
The Commission's reasoning was grounded in the procedural flaws in the agreement process, which undermined the genuineness of the agreement. The employer had failed to ensure that the agreement was discussed with the relevant employees and that there was sufficient consultation. Consequently, the Commission concluded that the agreement did not genuinely reflect the consensus of the employees. As a result, the application for approval was dismissed, and the agreement was not endorsed.
No further orders were made in light of the dismissal, leaving the employer to revisit the process of negotiating a genuinely agreed-upon enterprise agreement with the employees.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Agreement Approval
-
Better Off Overall Test
-
Genuine Agreement
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Viridian Glass Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 2384
Most Recent Citation
Ausdrill Pty Ltd T/A Ausdrill Ltd [2022] FWC 2539
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Appeal by Ausdrill Pty Ltd
[2022] FWCFB 223
Ausdrill Pty Ltd T/A Ausdrill Ltd
[2022] FWC 2539
Appeal by Ausdrill Pty Ltd
[2022] FWCFB 223
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Collinsville Coal Operations Pty Limited
[2014] FWCFB 7940
AWU v Rigforce Pty Ltd
[2019] FWCFB 6960