| [2021] FWCA 6162 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Viridian Glass Pty Ltd T/A Viridian Glass
(AG2021/7626)
VIRIDIAN GLASS CLAYTON MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 2021
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 12 OCTOBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the Viridian Glass Clayton Maintenance Agreement 2021
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Viridian Glass Clayton Maintenance Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Viridian Glass Pty Ltd T/A Viridian Glass. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 October 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE513406 PR734667>
- AGLC
- Viridian Glass Pty Ltd T/A Viridian Glass [2021] FWCA 6162
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 6162
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the maintenance agreement met all necessary criteria for approval under the applicable legislation. This required an examination of the agreement's terms and conditions, as well as its alignment with statutory requirements. The court needed to assess whether the agreement adequately protected the interests of the parties involved, particularly focusing on whether it provided a fair and reasonable framework for the maintenance services to be provided.
The court meticulously reviewed the terms of the maintenance agreement, considering the statutory framework and the specific provisions that governed such agreements. It found that the agreement contained all necessary elements required by law, including clear definitions of the services to be provided, the responsibilities of each party, and the mechanisms for resolving disputes. The court determined that the agreement was fair and reasonable and did not contravene any statutory requirements. Consequently, the court approved the maintenance agreement, ensuring that it would provide a reliable and lawful basis for the parties' future dealings. The final orders of the court reflected this decision, formally approving the agreement as submitted.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.