| [2024] FWCA 3589 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Viridian Glass Pty Ltd
(AG2024/2861)
VIRIDIAN GLASS TINGALPA AGREEMENT 2024
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| COMMISSIONER MATHESON | SYDNEY, 14 OCTOBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the Viridian Glass Tingalpa Agreement 2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Viridian Glass Tingalpa Agreement 2024 (Agreement). The application was made by Viridian Glass Pty Ltd (Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Applicant, who is also the employer covered by the Agreement, has provided a written undertaking. A copy of the undertaking is attached at Annexure A of this decision (Undertaking). The views of each person I know is a bargaining representative for the Agreement were sought in relation to the Undertaking and no objections were raised. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertaking is not likely to:
(a)cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b)result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertaking.
Subject to the Undertaking, and on the basis of the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval of the Agreement have been met.
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 October 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2027.
There is an obvious error in clause 31 of the Agreement in that the clause references and references to sections of the Act are incorrect. I provided a provisional view about variations that should be made pursuant to s.218A of the Act and invited the views of the parties. No objections to the proposed course of action were raised.
Pursuant to s.218A of the Act the Agreement is varied such that:
the first reference to ‘Clause XA’ in clause 31 of the Agreement reads as a reference to ‘clause 205A’;
the reference to ‘Clause XA of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)’ in clause 31.1 of the Agreement reads as a reference to ‘Clause 31 of this Agreement’;
the reference in the note in clause 31.1 to ‘clause XA’ reads as a reference to ‘clause 31’;
the reference to ‘clause XA’ in clause 31.2 reads as a reference to ‘clause 31’;
the reference to ‘clause XA’ in clause 31.3 reads as a reference to ‘clause 31’;
the reference to ‘clause XA.5’ in clause 31.6(a) reads as a reference to ‘clause 31.5’;
the reference to clause ‘XA.7(a)’ in clause 31.7(b) reads as a reference to ‘clause 31.7(a)’;
all references to ‘clause XA’ in clause 31.9 read as a reference to ‘clause 31’.
The variation operates from the date the Agreement commences operation.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE526386 PR780199>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Viridian Glass Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 3589
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 3589
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided adequate protections for employees, whether it was free from prohibited content, and whether it complied with the good faith bargaining requirements. The Commission had to ensure that the agreement did not contain any terms that were contrary to the objectives of the Fair Work Act, particularly those aimed at protecting employees' rights and ensuring fair workplace practices. Additionally, the Commission needed to assess if the agreement was genuinely negotiated and not imposed by the employer.
In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission evaluated the terms of the agreement against the legislative framework provided by the Fair Work Act. The Commission considered whether the agreement provided for adequate pay and conditions, including minimum wage rates, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and other employment benefits. It also examined if the agreement contained any terms that were inconsistent with the provisions of the Act or that could potentially undermine workers' rights. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval as it provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees and did not include any prohibited content.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Viridian Glass Tingalpa Agreement 2024, subject to certain conditions. The decision was based on the finding that the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act and provided adequate protections for the employees. The approval of the agreement ensures that the terms of employment are legally enforceable and that the rights of the workers are safeguarded under the new industrial arrangement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.