Vina Concha Y Toro SA v Southcorp Brands Pty Limited
Case
•
[2012] ATMO 107
•14 November 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Vina Concha Y Toro SA v Southcorp Brands Pty Limited [2012] ATMO 107
[2012] ATMO 107
14 November 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In this matter before the Registrar, Vina Concha Y Toro SA (the Opponent) opposed the registration of a trade mark by Southcorp Brands Pty Limited (the Applicant). The Opponent relied on its registered trade mark, CASILLERO DEL DIABLO, and its use in Australia. The Applicant's trade mark application was for "Dos Diablos".
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was whether the Opponent had established any grounds for opposing the Applicant's trade mark application. This involved considering the evidence presented by both parties regarding the use and recognition of the Opponent's trade mark in Australia.
The Registrar considered the evidence of use of the CASILLERO DEL DIABLO trade mark, noting its first use in Australia in 1993 and continuous use since then, including sales through a large retail network and features in wine industry publications. However, the Registrar concluded that the Opponent had not established any ground of opposition to the Applicant's trade mark application.
Consequently, the Registrar decided that the Applicant's trade mark application could proceed to registration one month from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. The Registrar also ordered that the Opponent pay the Applicant's costs.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was whether the Opponent had established any grounds for opposing the Applicant's trade mark application. This involved considering the evidence presented by both parties regarding the use and recognition of the Opponent's trade mark in Australia.
The Registrar considered the evidence of use of the CASILLERO DEL DIABLO trade mark, noting its first use in Australia in 1993 and continuous use since then, including sales through a large retail network and features in wine industry publications. However, the Registrar concluded that the Opponent had not established any ground of opposition to the Applicant's trade mark application.
Consequently, the Registrar decided that the Applicant's trade mark application could proceed to registration one month from the date of the decision, unless an appeal was filed. The Registrar also ordered that the Opponent pay the Applicant's costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Intellectual Property
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
26
Statutory Material Cited
0
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663
Chocolaterie Guylian N.V. v Registrar of Trade Marks
[2009] FCA 891
Sports Warehouse, Inc v Fry Consulting Pty Ltd
[2010] FCA 664