Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Viktorija Demian v Willoughby City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1292 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 9 May, 1 & 7 June 2017 Date of orders: 07 June 2017 Decision date: 07 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: APPEAL – s121B order - conciliation conference -agreement between the parties – order varied Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Victorija Demian (Applicant)
Willoughby City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
A Whealy, Mills Oakley (Applicant)
T Messenger, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/374203 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Appeal is upheld.
Pursuant to section 121ZK(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 the Court substitutes the Order No.2 and 15 issued on 24 November 2016 pursuant to section 121B of that Act in relation to 20 Weemala Road, Northbridge, with the Order No. 12 and 15 contained at Annexure A.
……………………….
Joanne Gray
Commissioner of the Court
374203.16 Gray (C) (1.60 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Viktorija Demian v Willoughby City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1292
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1292
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to resolve included whether the council's decision was lawful, reasonable, and supported by appropriate evidence. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the council had correctly applied the criteria set out in the relevant planning legislation and if the decision was made in accordance with the principles of natural justice.
The court found that the council's decision was not well-founded, as it was made without adequate consideration of the relevant evidence and planning principles. The court held that the council had not properly assessed the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding area and had failed to provide sufficient reasons for their decision. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration in line with the court's directions.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.