| [2019] FWCA 2465 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Viking Maintenance and Contracting Pty Ltd T/A Vmac Employment Solutions
(AG2018/7405)
AWU AND VMAC (HUON AQUACULTURE PROCESSING OPERATIONS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Seafood processing | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 10 APRIL 2019 |
Application for approval of the AWU and Vmac (Huon Aquaculture Processing Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AWU and Vmac (Huon Aquaculture Processing Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Viking Maintenance and Contracting Pty Ltd T/A Vmac Employment Solutions. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 April 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 May 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE502858 PR706820>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Viking Maintenance and Contracting Pty Ltd T/A Vmac Employment Solutions [2019] FWCA 2465
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 2465
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the FWC were whether the enterprise agreement met the requirements for approval under section 231 of the Fair Work Act, and specifically, whether it contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions of employment. The application centred on the argument that the agreement did not adequately address the issue of employee entitlements, particularly concerning penalty rates for work performed on public holidays and weekends.
In reaching its decision, the FWC examined the provisions of the agreement and the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The FWC noted that while the agreement contained most of the mandated minimum terms and conditions, it did not explicitly address the penalty rates for work on public holidays and weekends. The FWC determined that this omission rendered the agreement non-compliant with the statutory requirements. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed. The FWC ordered that the agreement be returned to the parties for amendment to ensure it fully complies with the Fair Work Act, after which it may be resubmitted for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.