Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2018] NSWLEC 1002 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 1 December 2017 Date of orders: 05 January 2018 Decision date: 05 January 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vigor Master Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Ku-ring-gai Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Ms I Wang, Litigant in Person (Applicant)
Mr J Merlino, HWL Ebsworth (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/230627 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
I note also that the Applicant undertakes as part of the agreement to pay the Respondent’s costs to the amount of $3,000.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, are:
The appeal is upheld.
The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans and documents listed in condition 1 of Annexure "A" hereto.
Application No. MOD048/17 for excavation, construction of stairs, retaining walls and a pathway at the Larkin Street frontage of the property, is approved subject to the conditions annexed and marked “A”.
……………………….
Jenny Smithson
Commissioner of the Land and Environment Court of NSW
Annexure A (C) (83.4 KB, docx)
- AGLC
- Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2018] NSWLEC 1002
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1002
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful, rational, and in accordance with the relevant planning legislation and policies. The court had to determine if the Council's decision was based on relevant considerations, and if the decision was open to challenge on the grounds of unreasonableness or procedural impropriety.
The court found that the Council's decision was based on relevant considerations and was not unreasonable or procedurally improper. The court concluded that the Council had correctly identified potential environmental impacts and had given appropriate weight to the relevant planning policies. The court also found that the decision-making process was transparent and that there were no procedural defects in the way the decision was made.
As a result, the court dismissed the plaintiff's application and upheld the Council's decision. The court did not make any orders for costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.