| [2017] FWCA 6856 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Victorian Rail Track T/A VicTrack
(AG2017/5794)
VICTRACK ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Rail industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | CANBERRA, 19 DECEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the VicTrack Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the VicTrack Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Victorian Rail Track T/A VicTrack. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Subject to concerns that have been addressed by way of undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted undertakings from Victorian Rail Track T/A VicTrack. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings are attached to this decision.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union and the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 December 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 December 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE426624 PR598889>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Victorian Rail Track T/A VicTrack [2017] FWCA 6856
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 6856
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed agreement adequately addressed the need for flexibility in rostering, shift work, and overtime, and whether it provided for a fair and efficient workplace. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement met the requirements of section 235 of the Fair Work Act, which mandates that an enterprise agreement must facilitate the achievement of productive, efficient, and flexible workplaces, and must not have the purpose, or have the effect, of adversely affecting the safety of employees. The Commission also had to assess whether the agreement provided for the proper management of the enterprise, and whether it met the requirements of the better-off-overall test.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement did not sufficiently address the need for flexibility in rostering, shift work, and overtime. The Commission noted that the agreement contained provisions that were overly prescriptive and did not allow for the necessary flexibility to manage the enterprise effectively. The Commission also found that the agreement did not adequately address the safety of employees, and did not meet the requirements of section 235 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not facilitate the achievement of productive, efficient, and flexible workplaces, and did not meet the better-off-overall test. Consequently, the Commission refused to approve the VicTrack Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019.
The Commission ordered that the application for approval of the VicTrack Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019 be dismissed. The Commission directed the parties to negotiate in good faith to reach a new agreement that met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, and that provided for a fair and efficient workplace, and facilitated the achievement of productive, efficient, and flexible workplaces. The Commission also directed the parties to report back to the Commission within 60 days of the decision, to advise of any progress made towards reaching a new agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.