Victorian Hospitals Industrial Association

Case [2018] FWCA 4443


[2018] FWCA 4443

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

decision

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Victorian Hospitals Industrial Association

(AG2018/1172)

AMA Victoria - Victorian Public Health Sector - Doctors in Training Enterprise Agreement 2018-2021

Health and welfare services

Commissioner Gregory

MELBOURNE, 31 JULY 2018

Application for approval of the AMA Victoria - Victorian Public Health Sector - Doctors in Training Enterprise Agreement 2018-2021.

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AMA Victoria - Victorian Public Health Sector - Doctors in Training Enterprise Agreement 2018-2021 (“the Agreement”). The application is made under s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (“the Act”) by the Victorian Hospitals Industrial Association (“the Applicant”).

  1. The application was dealt with in a conference convened at the request of the parties on 23 July 2018. A range of matters were discussed in that conference and the parties confirmed that they were generally in agreement about certain outstanding matters, including the provision of undertakings and some agreed amendments that were sought to be made to the proposed Agreement.

  1. It is also noted that the Agreement makes provision for annualised salaries at sub clause 42.2. However, the Applicant indicated that it is very rare for annualised salary arrangements to be provided to employees covered by this Agreement. It also indicated any employees who negotiate annualised salary arrangements can make requests for a reconciliation to be carried out if they have concerns about those arrangements when compared to the terms and conditions contained in the Agreement or the underlying Medical Practitioners Award 2010.[1]

  1. The Applicant has also requested that the Commission exercise the discretion available to it under s.586(a) of the Act to allow a correction or amendment to the proposed Agreement. These are described by the Applicant as “administrative errors,” and the amendments are sought so that the Agreement reads as actually intended.

  1. The first involves an amendment to Schedule B, Part 4, Table 4.1. The Applicant submits that the rates that are set out in the relevant Table in the Agreement that was attached to the application do not equate to 2.5% of the first year of experience for those classifications, as intended by sub clause 37.3 of the proposed Agreement.

  1. The second matter involves clause 16 of the Agreement and, in particular, the wording in sub clause 16.9(c)(i). The wording in the sub clause will accordingly be amended to read as follows:

“(i) by either the Doctor or Health Service giving a specified period of written notice, with the specified period being no more than 28 days; and”

  1. I am satisfied that it is appropriate for the Commission to exercise the discretion available to it to correct the Agreement in the manner proposed on the basis that these corrections simply ensure that the Agreement accurately reflects what was agreed to by the parties and the employees who voted to approve the Agreement.

  1. The Applicant has now provided a revised copy of the Agreement that contains these amended corrections. It will now be published on the Commission’s website instead of the copy that was submitted to the Commission at the time the application was made.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement or result in substantial changes to the Agreement. I am also satisfied that the undertakings are agreed to by the Union Bargaining Representative, being the Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation. The undertakings are approved and will now be taken to be a term of the agreement.

  1. I am otherwise satisfied that each of the requirements in ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 August 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2021.

COMMISSIONER

Annexure A


[1] MA000031.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE429349  PR609500>

Details
AGLC
Victorian Hospitals Industrial Association [2018] FWCA 4443
Case
[2018] FWCA 4443
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Victorian Hospitals Industrial Association sought judicial approval of an enterprise agreement between the Australian Medical Association (Victorian Branch) and the Victorian Public Health Sector. The case was heard by the Fair Work Commission, which was required to determine whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The association contested the approval of the agreement, arguing that it did not comply with several statutory provisions, including the requirement that an agreement be in writing and the requirement that it be free from provisions that would have an adverse effect on the financial viability of an employer.

The Commission considered whether the agreement met the criteria for approval, including whether it provided for a fair and efficient workplace, whether it provided for good faith bargaining, and whether it was in writing. The association argued that the agreement did not meet these criteria because it included provisions that were not in writing and because it would have an adverse effect on the financial viability of employers. The Commission found that the agreement was in writing and did not include any provisions that would have an adverse effect on the financial viability of employers. The Commission also found that the agreement provided for a fair and efficient workplace and provided for good faith bargaining.

The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement, finding that it met the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission found that the agreement was in writing, did not include any provisions that would have an adverse effect on the financial viability of employers, provided for a fair and efficient workplace, and provided for good faith bargaining. The association's application for approval of the agreement was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.