[2013] FWCA 3062 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association
(AG2013/6129)
VICTORIAN PUBLIC HEALTH SECTOR (MEDICAL SCIENTISTS, PHARMACISTS AND PSYCHOLOGISTS) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012-2016
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 15 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Victorian Public Health Sector (Medical Scientists, Pharmacists and Psychologists) Enterprise Agreement 2012-2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Victorian Public Health Sector (Medical Scientists, Pharmacists and Psychologists) Enterprise Agreement 2012-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 22 May 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2016.
[4] The Health Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code Y, AE401277 PR536936>
- AGLC
- Victorian Hospitals’ Industrial Association [2013] FWCA 3062
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3062
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission identified that the enterprise agreement contained provisions that appeared to provide for rates of pay and conditions of employment that were not consistent with the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the agreement included provisions that could result in employees being paid less than the applicable minimum rates of pay and conditions set out in the relevant awards. The Commission held that these provisions were not consistent with the Act and could not be approved. The Commission also noted that the agreement contained a number of other provisions that were inconsistent with the Act, including provisions that could result in employees being required to work more hours than permitted by the relevant awards.
The application was dismissed. The Commission held that the enterprise agreement did not meet the requirements of the Act and could not be approved. The Commission further held that the agreement contained a number of other provisions that were inconsistent with the Act and could not be approved. The agreement was therefore not approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.