Victoria Leeman
Case
•
[2018] FWC 3584
•19 JUNE 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Victoria Leeman [2018] FWC 3584
[2018] FWC 3584
19 JUNE 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Victoria Leeman made an application to the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, seeking an order to stop bullying in relation to her work in Roads and Maritime Services. The court was required to determine whether it had the jurisdiction to hear the application. The key legal issues were whether Leeman was ‘at work in’ Roads and Maritime Services, whether Roads and Maritime Services was a constitutionally-covered business, and whether it was a trading corporation engaging in substantial or significant trading activities.
The court considered that Leeman was indeed ‘at work in’ Roads and Maritime Services as she was employed by the entity and performing her duties when the alleged bullying occurred. Regarding the constitutional coverage, the court examined the scope of section 51(xxxv) of the Constitution and whether Roads and Maritime Services engaged in trading or commercial activities. It found that the entity was a trading corporation and engaged in substantial trading activities, thus falling within the scope of the Constitution. The court dismissed the jurisdictional objections, concluding that it had the authority to hear the application.
Consequently, the jurisdictional objections raised by the respondent were dismissed, paving the way for the court to proceed with the substantive application for an order to stop the alleged bullying in relation to Leeman's work in Roads and Maritime Services.
The court considered that Leeman was indeed ‘at work in’ Roads and Maritime Services as she was employed by the entity and performing her duties when the alleged bullying occurred. Regarding the constitutional coverage, the court examined the scope of section 51(xxxv) of the Constitution and whether Roads and Maritime Services engaged in trading or commercial activities. It found that the entity was a trading corporation and engaged in substantial trading activities, thus falling within the scope of the Constitution. The court dismissed the jurisdictional objections, concluding that it had the authority to hear the application.
Consequently, the jurisdictional objections raised by the respondent were dismissed, paving the way for the court to proceed with the substantive application for an order to stop the alleged bullying in relation to Leeman's work in Roads and Maritime Services.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Breach of Contract
-
Specific Performance
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Victoria Leeman [2018] FWC 3584
Most Recent Citation
Kour [2024] FWC 2342
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Roads and Maritime Services v Leeman
[2018] FWCFB 5772
Kour
[2024] FWC 2342
Ms Victoria Leeman
[2019] FWC 2228
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
0
Re Dalco; Ex parte Dalco v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
[1986] FCA 357
Australian Wool Innovation Ltd v Newkirk
[2005] FCA 290