Victor John Ferguson v Pamela Stott

In *Victor John Ferguson v Pamela Stott* [1996] NSWCA 183, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered a dispute between the appellant, Victor John Ferguson, and the respondent, Pamela Stott. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but it was brought before the Court of Appeal for determination.

The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was the interpretation and application of certain provisions of the *Real Property Act 1900* (NSW) in the context of the dispute between the parties. Specifically, the court was required to determine the legal effect of a particular transaction or claim concerning real property, likely involving rights or interests in land.

The Court of Appeal's reasoning and the legal principles applied are not elaborated upon in the provided text. However, the court's engagement with the *Real Property Act 1900* (NSW) indicates that the decision would have turned on the statutory framework governing land ownership, registration, and dealings in New South Wales. The court would have analysed the relevant sections of the Act to ascertain the rights and obligations of the parties.

The final orders or outcome of the appeal are not specified in the provided text.