Veterinary Surgeons Board v Griffin
Case
•
[2017] QCAT 93
•27 March 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Veterinary Surgeons Board v Griffin [2017] QCAT 93
[2017] QCAT 93
27 March 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Veterinary Surgeons Board of Queensland v Griffin involved allegations of professional misconduct against Dr Victor Leslie Griffin. The Board referred several allegations to the Tribunal regarding Dr Griffin's conduct in his capacity as a veterinary surgeon. These included allegations that Dr Griffin supplied, dispensed and administered drugs, and treated horses, without keeping adequate records. Following an investigation and hearing, the Tribunal found the allegations substantiated. The Tribunal concluded that Dr Griffin's conduct constituted 'misconduct in a professional respect'. As such, the Tribunal was required to consider the appropriate action to be taken in response to these findings.
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the allegations against Dr Griffin were substantiated and, if so, what the appropriate sanction should be. The Tribunal considered the relevant statutory provisions and case law in making its decision. The Veterinary Surgeons Act 1936 (Qld) provides for the removal of a registrant's name from the register and a prohibition on re-application for registration in cases of misconduct. The Tribunal found that the seriousness of the misconduct warranted the imposition of both sanctions. The Tribunal also considered the need to protect the public and maintain the integrity of the profession.
In reaching its decision, the Tribunal found that Dr Griffin had failed to keep adequate records in relation to his treatment of horses and his supply, dispensation and administration of drugs. This conduct was found to be a serious breach of professional standards and constituted misconduct. The Tribunal considered the impact of Dr Griffin's conduct on the public and the veterinary profession, as well as the need to deter similar conduct in the future. The Tribunal concluded that the appropriate sanction was the removal of Dr Griffin's name from the register and a prohibition on re-application for registration for a period of eighteen months. The Tribunal also ordered Dr Griffin to pay the costs of the proceedings.
The Tribunal made two orders pursuant to the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1936 (Qld). Firstly, Dr Griffin's name was removed from the register effective from fourteen days from the date of the order. Secondly, Dr Griffin was prohibited from re-applying for registration to the Veterinary Surgeons Board of Queensland for a period of eighteen months effective from fourteen days from the date of the order. Additionally, the Tribunal ordered Dr Griffin to pay the costs of the proceedings.
The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were whether the allegations against Dr Griffin were substantiated and, if so, what the appropriate sanction should be. The Tribunal considered the relevant statutory provisions and case law in making its decision. The Veterinary Surgeons Act 1936 (Qld) provides for the removal of a registrant's name from the register and a prohibition on re-application for registration in cases of misconduct. The Tribunal found that the seriousness of the misconduct warranted the imposition of both sanctions. The Tribunal also considered the need to protect the public and maintain the integrity of the profession.
In reaching its decision, the Tribunal found that Dr Griffin had failed to keep adequate records in relation to his treatment of horses and his supply, dispensation and administration of drugs. This conduct was found to be a serious breach of professional standards and constituted misconduct. The Tribunal considered the impact of Dr Griffin's conduct on the public and the veterinary profession, as well as the need to deter similar conduct in the future. The Tribunal concluded that the appropriate sanction was the removal of Dr Griffin's name from the register and a prohibition on re-application for registration for a period of eighteen months. The Tribunal also ordered Dr Griffin to pay the costs of the proceedings.
The Tribunal made two orders pursuant to the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1936 (Qld). Firstly, Dr Griffin's name was removed from the register effective from fourteen days from the date of the order. Secondly, Dr Griffin was prohibited from re-applying for registration to the Veterinary Surgeons Board of Queensland for a period of eighteen months effective from fourteen days from the date of the order. Additionally, the Tribunal ordered Dr Griffin to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Professional Regulation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Professional Conduct
-
Misconduct
-
Remedial Orders
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Veterinary Surgeons Board of Queensland v Butterworth [2025] QCATA 43
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Veterinary Surgeons Board of Queensland v Butterworth
[2025] QCATA 43
Veterinary Surgeons Board of Queensland v GLM
[2022] QCAT 337
Veterinary Surgeons Board of Queensland v Butterworth
[2025] QCATA 43
Cases Cited
15
Statutory Material Cited
3
Veterinary Surgeons Board of Queensland v Griffin
[2016] QCAT 380
VETERINARY SURGEONS' BOARD OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA and ALEXANDER
[2014] WASAT 105
Gelderman v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee (GD)
[2001] NSWADTAP 27