| [2014] FWCA 8169 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Very Special Kids
(AG2014/9686)
VERY SPECIAL KIDS AND FAMILY SUPPORT TEAM ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2017
Social, community, home care and disability services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 17 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Very Special Kids and Family Support Team Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Very Special Kids and Family Support Team Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Very Special Kids. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I have accepted the undertaking attached to this decision which has been given by the employer.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Services Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 24 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE411189 PR557843>
- AGLC
- Very Special Kids [2014] FWCA 8169
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8169
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the Enterprise Agreement provided adequate protections for employees and whether it was made in good faith and in accordance with the relevant legislative provisions. This involved assessing the agreement's compliance with the Fair Work Act, including provisions concerning minimum entitlements, the process for agreement making, and the rights of employees to be involved in the negotiation of the agreement.
The Commission found that the agreement was generally in line with the statutory requirements, noting that while there were some minor procedural issues, these did not undermine the overall validity of the agreement. The Commission emphasised that the agreement included provisions that ensured employees were not disadvantaged and that the process by which the agreement was made was fair. Commissioner McCabe concluded that the agreement should be approved, as it met the necessary criteria and was in the best interests of both the organisation and its employees.
The Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, with certain minor conditions attached to address the procedural concerns identified. These conditions required the organisation to ensure compliance with the agreed terms and to provide additional information to employees regarding their rights under the agreement. The decision underscores the importance of procedural fairness in the negotiation and approval of enterprise agreements within the non-profit sector.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.