[2016] FWCA 2155
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| Veolia Water Services (ANZ) Pty Ltd |
| (AG2016/2444) |
VEOLIA WATER SERVICES PTY LTD (BALLARAT OPERATIONS)
ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Water, sewerage and drainage services
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 7 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of the Veolia Water Services Pty Ltd (Ballarat Operations)
Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Veolia Water Services Pty Ltd (Ballarat Operations) Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the
Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
It has been made by Veolia Water Services (ANZ) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single
enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the
employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and
(3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work
Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[2016] FWCA 2155
[4] The Agreement was approved on 7 April 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 14 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE418483 PR578757>
- AGLC
- Veolia Water Services (ANZ) Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 2155
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2155
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the Commissioner had to determine were whether the application met the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Act, and whether the group of employees involved was fairly chosen. The Commissioner needed to ensure that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement and that it was not discriminatory in nature. Additionally, the Commissioner needed to consider whether the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 was incorporated into the agreement.
Commissioner Roe found that the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Act had been met. The Commissioner also found that the group of employees was fairly chosen, despite the fact that the agreement did not cover all employees of the employer. The Commissioner took into account the factors in section 186(3) and (3A) of the Act in making this determination. Furthermore, the Commissioner determined that the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 was incorporated into the agreement.
The Commissioner approved the enterprise agreement on 7 April 2016, and it will operate from 14 April 2016. The nominal expiry date of the agreement is 31 December 2018. This decision provides clarity and guidance to employers and employees involved in the water, sewerage, and drainage services industry in relation to enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.