Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. T/A Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

Case [2023] FWCA 2250


[2023] FWCA 2250

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. T/A Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

(AG2023/2245)

VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LTD. COMMERCIAL SERVICES (TASMANIA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023-2026

Waste management industry

COMMISSIONER JOHNS

MELBOURNE, 20 JULY 2023

Application for approval of the "Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. Commercial Services (Tasmania) Enterprise Agreement 2023-2026”

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the “Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. Commercial Services (Tasmania) Enterprise Agreement 2023-2026” (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. T/A Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

  1. However, an assessment of the Agreement has identified that several clauses may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES).  In particular, terms relating to:

a)clause 10.7.1: Casual conversion,

b)clause 24.4: Compassionate leave.

  1. Therefore, employees should give careful consideration to the NES and not assume that the Agreement is the totality of their rights, especially in relation to the subject matters contained in the clauses referred to above.

  1. Because of the undertaking proffered by the employer, there is a clause that gives precedence to the NES over the Agreement to the extent the Agreement contains less favourable terms.

  1. Noting the NES precedence clause, to the extent that any clause in the Agreement is inconsistent with the NES, it is not an impediment to the approval of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 July 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2026.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE520830  PR764419>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. T/A Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. [2023] FWCA 2250
Case
[2023] FWCA 2250
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd., trading as Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd., applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the "Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. Commercial Services (Tasmania) Enterprise Agreement 2023-2026." The applicant sought to have the agreement recognised as a registered enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The nature of the dispute involved the procedural fairness of the agreement and whether it complied with the requirements of the Act.

The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it was appropriately negotiated. The court also needed to determine if the agreement provided for proper consultation and if the process for seeking approval was followed correctly. Additionally, the court examined if the agreement met the requirements for being a "genuine" enterprise agreement as outlined in the Fair Work Act.

The court found that the applicant had acted in good faith and that the agreement was appropriately negotiated. The court determined that there was proper consultation and that the process for seeking approval was followed. The court concluded that the agreement met the requirements of a genuine enterprise agreement and was therefore approved. The court's reasoning was based on the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process and the content of the agreement.

The final orders of the court were that the "Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty. Ltd. Commercial Services (Tasmania) Enterprise Agreement 2023-2026" be approved as a registered enterprise agreement. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission and would be in effect from the date of the decision. The court also directed that the agreement be published in the Federal Register of Legislation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.