Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited

Case [2023] FWCA 1012


[2023] FWCA 1012

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited

(AG2023/949)

VENTIA UTILITY SERVICES PTY LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017

Building services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE

SYDNEY, 5 APRIL 2023

Application for termination of the Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited Environmental Operations Enterprise Agreement 2017

  1. An application has been made by Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited (Applicant) for the termination of the Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited Environmental Operations Enterprise Agreement 2017 (Agreement).

  1. The application is made under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act), which allows for a party to apply to the Commission to terminate an enterprise agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date.

  1. Relevantly, s.226 of the Act reads:

226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

(1) If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the agreement would be unfair for the employees covered by the agreement; or

(b) the FWC is satisfied that the agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees; or

(c) all of the following apply:

(i) the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the enterprise agreement would pose a significant threat to the viability of a business carried on by the employer, or employers, covered by the agreement;

(ii) the FWC is satisfied that the termination of the enterprise agreement would be likely to reduce the potential of terminations of employment covered by subsection (2) for the employees covered by the agreement;

(iii) if the agreement contains terms providing entitlements relating to the termination of employees’ employment—each employer covered by the agreement has given the FWC a guarantee of termination entitlements in relation to the termination of the agreement.

(1A) However, the FWC must terminate the enterprise agreement under subsection (1) only if the FWC is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to do so.

(2) This subsection covers a termination of the employment of an employee:

(a) at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour; or

(b) because of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the employer.

(3) In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC must consider the views of the following covered by the agreement:

(a) the employees (unless there are no employees covered by the agreement);

(b) each employer;

(c) each employee organisation (if any).

Note: The President may be required to direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to the matter if any of the employers, employees, or employee organisations, covered by the agreement oppose the termination (see subsection 615A(3)).

(4) In deciding whether to terminate the agreement (the existing agreement), the FWC must have regard to:

(a) whether the application was made at or after the notification time for a proposed enterprise agreement that will cover the same, or substantially the same, group of employees as the existing agreement; and

(b) whether bargaining for the proposed enterprise agreement is occurring; and

(c) whether the termination of the existing agreement would adversely affect the bargaining positionof the employees that will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.

(5) In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC may also have regard to any other relevant matter”.

  1. The Applicant employer has provided, in support of its termination application, a statutory declaration and Form F24C – Declaration in relation to termination of an enterprise agreement after the nominal expiry date from Mr Alishan Megerdichian, Senior Legal Counsel (Employment). Mr Megerdichian declares that the Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, that there are no employees covered or likely to be covered by it, and, accordingly, its termination will have no effect on the Applicant or its employees.  I make findings in accordance with the evidence of the Applicant.

Consideration

  1. I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest, and that s.226(4) of the Act is not applicable in this case. I am not aware of any other relevant matter that I need to have regard to (s.226(5)).  Taking into account the evidence and views of the Applicant, I consider that in all of the circumstances (cf, s.226(1)(b), (1A) and (3)) it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement. Accordingly, the Agreement is terminated pursuant to s.227 of the Act. The termination takes effect on and from the date of this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE427338  PR760917>

Details
AGLC
Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited [2023] FWCA 1012
Case
[2023] FWCA 1012
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission was an application by Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited to terminate the Environmental Operations Enterprise Agreement 2017. This agreement was in place between the company and the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union. The application centred on the company's assertion that significant changes in the business environment necessitated changes to the terms and conditions of employment that were beyond the scope of what could be reasonably negotiated under the existing agreement. The company argued that the changes were necessary to maintain the company’s viability and competitiveness.

The legal issues the court had to address were primarily concerned with the threshold conditions for terminating an enterprise agreement under section 235 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the changes in the business environment were genuine and whether the agreement’s terms were no longer appropriate in light of these changes. Additionally, the court considered whether the application was made in good faith and whether the application met the procedural requirements set out in the Act.

In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties regarding the changes in the business environment and their impact on the company’s operations. The Commission also evaluated whether the company had genuinely attempted to negotiate changes to the agreement before applying for its termination. The Commission found that while the company had faced significant challenges, it had not sufficiently demonstrated that the changes were beyond the scope of what could be reasonably negotiated. Furthermore, the Commission concluded that the application was not made in good faith as the company had not exhausted all avenues for negotiation. Consequently, the application for termination was dismissed.

The Fair Work Commission ordered that the Environmental Operations Enterprise Agreement 2017 would remain in force and effect. The company was directed to continue to comply with its terms until a new agreement was negotiated or until the agreement was otherwise terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.