| [2019] FWCA 2559 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited
(AG2019/753)
VENTIA UTILITY SERVICES PTY LIMITED ELECTRICAL SUPPLY INDUSTRY CONTRACTORS QUEENSLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018-2021
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 15 APRIL 2019 |
Application for approval of the Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited Electrical Supply Industry Contractors Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2018-2021.
[1] Application has been made for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited Electrical Supply Industry Contractors Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2018-2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited.
[2] Written undertakings have been given in accordance with s.190 of the Act. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] With the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 22 April 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE502926 PR706997>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Ventia Utility Services Pty Limited [2019] FWCA 2559
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 2559
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the procedural fairness requirements and substantive provisions of the Act. The respondents argued that the agreement did not fairly represent the interests of the employees and that the consultation process was inadequate. They also claimed that certain clauses in the agreement were not in the best interests of the employees. The Commission had to consider these arguments and assess whether the agreement met the criteria for approval as stipulated in the legislation.
The Commission found that the agreement was procedurally sound, as the employer had followed the necessary steps in the bargaining process and had engaged in meaningful consultation with the unions. However, the Commission identified issues with certain clauses that did not align with the best interests of the employees. After considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission determined that, while there were procedural flaws, the overall agreement was in the best interests of the employees and met the legal standards for approval. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement subject to specific modifications to address the identified concerns.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.