| [2016] FWCA 4038 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Ventia Pty Ltd
(AG2016/3502)
VENTIA TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE OPERATIONS (NEW SOUTH WALES) CEPU ELECTRICIANS AGREEMENT 2016 - 2018
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 21 JUNE 2016 |
Application for approval of the Ventia Transport Infrastructure Operations (New South Wales) CEPU Electricians Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Ventia Transport Infrastructure Operations (New South Wales) CEPU Electricians Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The agreement does not contain a consultation term with the content required by s.205(1) and (1A). Accordingly, in accordance with s.205(2), the model consultation term contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the agreement.
[4] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 28 June 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE419488 PR581877>
- AGLC
- Ventia Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 4038
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4038
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement complied with the formal requirements of the Act, specifically whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it was a genuine agreement. The Commission also considered whether the agreement provided for the proper operation of the enterprise and its employees, and whether it was in the best interests of the employees. The applicant argued that the agreement was made in good faith and provided for the proper operation of the enterprise and its employees. The Commission found that the agreement met the requirements for approval under the Act.
In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the agreement had been made in good faith and provided for the proper operation of the enterprise and its employees. The Commission also found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, as it provided for a fair and reasonable set of terms and conditions of employment. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the agreement. The applicant's application for approval of the agreement was successful, and the agreement was registered with the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.