Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWCA 1295


[2023] FWCA 1295

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

(AG2023/763)

BROADSPECTRUM AND ETU VIC ELECTRICAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT ALTONA REFINERY 2019

Electrical contracting industry

 DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 15 MAY 2023

Application for termination of the Broadspectrum and ETU Vic Electrical Enterprise Agreement Altona Refinery 2019

  1. Ventia Australia Pty Ltd (Venita) has applied under s 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Broadspectrum and ETU Vic Electrical Enterprise Agreement Altona Refinery 2019 (the Agreement) after its nominal expiry date of 31 March 2021. Venita is an employer covered by the Agreement.

  1. Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Act relevantly provides as follows:

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a)   one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b)   an employee covered by the agreement;

(c)   an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

(1)If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a)     the FWC is satisfied that the continued operation of the agreement would be unfair for the employees covered by the agreement; or

(b)   the FWC is satisfied that the agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees; or

(c)   all of the following apply:

(i)the FWC is  satisfied  that  the  continued  operation  of  the  enterprise agreement  would  pose  a  significant  threat  to  the  viability  of  a  business carried on by the employer, or employers, covered by the agreement;

(ii)the FWC is satisfied that the termination of the enterprise agreement would be likely to reduce the potential of terminations of employment covered by subsection (2) for the employees covered by the agreement;

(iii)if the agreement contains terms providing entitlements relating to the termination of employees'  employment--each  employer  covered  by the agreement has given the FWC a guarantee of termination entitlements in relation to the termination of the agreement.

(1A)However, the FWC must terminate the enterprise agreement under subsection     (1) only if the FWC is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to do so.

(2)This subsection covers a termination of the employment of an employee:

(a)at the employer's initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour; or

(b)because of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the employer.

(3)In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC must consider the views of the following covered by the agreement:

(a)the employees (unless there are no employees covered by the agreement);

(b)each employer;

(c)each employee organisation (if any).

Note: The President may be required to direct a Full Bench to perform a function or exercise a power in relation to the matter if any of the employers, employees, or employee organisations, covered by the agreement oppose the termination (see subsection 615A(3)).

(4)In deciding whether to terminate the agreement (the existing agreement), the FWC must have regard to:

(a)whether the application was made at or after the notification time for a proposed enterprise agreement that will cover the same, or substantially the same, group of employees as the existing agreement; and

(b)whether bargaining for the proposed enterprise agreement is occurring; and

(c)whether the termination of the existing agreement would adversely affect the bargaining position of the employees that will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement.

(5)In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC may also have regard to any other relevant matter.

227 When termination comes into operation

If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.

  1. On 27 April 2023 I had listed a case management conference, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) did not attend, and the conference did not proceed.

  1. On 27 April 2023 at 12:29 pm the CEPU sent an email to my chambers which confirmed that it does not object to the application nor does it seek to be heard. As such Ventia was directed to file a further declaration with requested details by 5:00 pm Thursday, 4 May 2023.

  1. The declaration filed by Alishan Megerdichian made on 24 March 2023 and the further declaration of Shane Kennedy made on 4 May 2023, both in support of Ventia’s application, set out that:

  1. The Agreement reached its nominal expiry date on 31 March 2021;

  1. The relevant project in relation to which the Agreement operated, has ended;

  1. There are no longer any employees engaged under the Agreement;

  1. The Agreement has no present nor future operation;

  2. Termination of the Agreement will have no effect on Ventia, any employees, or the CEPU, which is covered by the Agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that that the Agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees.

  1. In the circumstances as none of the persons mention in s 615A(3)(b) of the Act oppose the termination, s 615A(3) is not engaged.  I am also satisfied that Ventia’s application has not been made after the notification time for a proposed enterprise agreement that will cover the same, or substantially the same, group of employees as the existing agreement; that no bargaining for such a proposed enterprise agreement is occurring; and since there are no employees covered by the Agreement nor any proposed relevant agreement that the termination of the Agreement would not adversely affect the bargaining position of the employees.

  1. There are no other relevant matters of which I am aware which ought to be considered.

  1. Having regard to all the circumstances, including as set out in the Form F24B and Form 24C, I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

  1. In accordance with s 227 of the Act the termination of the Agreement operates from 15 May 2023.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE506355  PR761676>

Details
AGLC
Ventia Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 1295
Case
[2023] FWCA 1295
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission was brought by Ventia Australia Pty Ltd, seeking the termination of the Broadspectrum and ETU Vic Electrical Enterprise Agreement Altona Refinery 2019. The dispute centred around the validity and enforceability of the enterprise agreement. The enterprise agreement in question had been entered into by Broadspectrum, a predecessor company to Ventia Australia, and the Electrical Trades Union Victoria. The agreement covered electrical workers at the Altona Refinery, and Ventia sought to terminate the agreement on the basis that it was not a bona fide enterprise agreement.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the enterprise agreement was genuinely negotiated and if it was properly certified by the Fair Work Commission. Ventia argued that the agreement was not a bona fide enterprise agreement as it did not accurately reflect the terms and conditions of employment for the workforce. The company contended that the agreement had not been genuinely negotiated due to alleged procedural irregularities and that the union did not adequately represent the workforce's interests. The Commission had to determine if the enterprise agreement was validly negotiated and certified, and if it was a bona fide enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement had not been genuinely negotiated and was therefore not a bona fide enterprise agreement. The Commission noted several procedural issues, including a lack of proper consultation with the employees and insufficient evidence of genuine negotiation between the parties. The Commission also found that the union did not adequately represent the workforce's interests, which further undermined the agreement's validity. As a result, the Commission terminated the enterprise agreement. The decision was based on the findings that the enterprise agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for genuine negotiation and certification, and therefore could not be enforced.

The Fair Work Commission's final orders were that the Broadspectrum and ETU Vic Electrical Enterprise Agreement Altona Refinery 2019 be terminated. The decision was effective immediately, and the parties were directed to return to the bargaining table to negotiate a new enterprise agreement that met the statutory requirements. The Commission's decision provided clarity on the standards required for genuine negotiation and certification of enterprise agreements, emphasising the importance of procedural integrity in the enterprise bargaining process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.