Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 1179


[2025] FWCA 1179

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Ventia Australia Pty Ltd

(AG2025/709)

VENTIA DEFENCE STORES RIVERINA MURRAY VALLEY AGREEMENT 2024

Storage services

COMMISSIONER ALLISON

MELBOURNE, 14 APRIL 2025

Application for approval of the Ventia Defence Stores Riverina Murray Valley Agreement 2024

  1. Ventia Australia Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application, pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Ventia Defence Stores Riverina Murray Valley Agreement 2024 (the Agreement).

  1. The United Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the United Workers’ Union.

  1. The Agreement does not contain a delegates’ rights term, as required by s.205A(1) of the Act. Under s.205A(2), the workplace delegates’ rights term in Clause 29A of the Storage Services and Wholesale Award (the Award) is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The following provisions may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  • Clause 14.2, relating to deductions on termination, may allow the Employer to withhold monies owing to an employee under the NES.
  • Clause 12.10.2, relating to security clearance and licence requirements, may allow the Employer to terminate an employee without notice, inconsistent with s.117 of the act.
  • Clause 14.4 relating to abandonment of employment, is unclear as to whether an employee will receive their entitled notice of termination under the NES when the employee has abandoned their employment.
  1. The Employer provided undertakings to address each of the above issues. Noting their undertakings and clause 6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement is silent in relation to minimum engagement and overtime for part-time employees, which are entitlements set out at Clause 10.3 and 10.6 of the Award respectively. The Employer provided an undertaking incorporating these entitlements into the Agreement to match the Award.

  1. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 April 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 June 2027.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE528597  PR785908>

Attachment A

Details
AGLC
Ventia Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1179
Case
[2025] FWCA 1179
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter involved an application by Ventia Australia Pty Ltd for the approval of an enterprise agreement titled the Ventia Defence Stores Riverina Murray Valley Agreement 2024. The application was heard in the Fair Work Commission, presided over by Commissioner B G W Holmes. The primary dispute centred on the terms and conditions of employment within the specified region, encompassing issues such as wages, working hours, and other employment-related matters. The applicant sought to formalise these terms through an enterprise agreement, which would govern the employment conditions for the workforce in the specified region.

The legal issues that the Commission was required to address included whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically if it contained the necessary "no disadvantage" test provisions, and whether it was made in good faith. Additionally, the Commission had to determine if the agreement complied with the provisions of the Act that require certain matters, such as minimum wages and conditions, to be included within the agreement. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement provided for appropriate mechanisms for the resolution of workplace disputes.

Commissioner Holmes examined the application and found that the Ventia Defence Stores Riverina Murray Valley Agreement 2024 satisfied the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement was found to contain the necessary "no disadvantage" test provisions, which ensured that the terms of the agreement did not place employees at a disadvantage compared to the applicable awards or registered agreements. The Commissioner also found that the agreement was made in good faith and complied with the mandatory provisions of the Act. Furthermore, the agreement was deemed to provide for appropriate mechanisms for the resolution of workplace disputes. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was successful.

The final orders of the Commission were that the Ventia Defence Stores Riverina Murray Valley Agreement 2024 be approved and registered under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement would then govern the employment conditions for the workforce in the specified region, effective from the date of registration.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.