VENIS & PAITSON
Case
•
[2020] FamCA 174
•23 March 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
VENIS & PAITSON [2020] FamCA 174
[2020] FamCA 174
23 March 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Venis & Paitson*, heard before Williams J, the applicant sought an order for her costs arising from the respondent's notice of objection to a subpoena.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the circumstances warranted an order for the applicant's costs in relation to specific court appearances, namely a Subpoena Hearing on 23 October 2019, an Interim Hearing on 17 January 2020, and another Interim Hearing on 11 February 2020.
Williams J ordered that the respondent pay the applicant's agreed costs for these appearances, to be calculated in accordance with the relevant scale. In the event that the parties could not agree on the costs, they were to be taxed.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the circumstances warranted an order for the applicant's costs in relation to specific court appearances, namely a Subpoena Hearing on 23 October 2019, an Interim Hearing on 17 January 2020, and another Interim Hearing on 11 February 2020.
Williams J ordered that the respondent pay the applicant's agreed costs for these appearances, to be calculated in accordance with the relevant scale. In the event that the parties could not agree on the costs, they were to be taxed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
VENIS & PAITSON [2020] FamCA 174
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1