[2014] FWCA 474 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd
(AG2013/10239)
VEC CIVIL ENGINEERING PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011 - 2014 [RAIL DIVISION]
Tasmania | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 17 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for variation of the VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011 - 2014 [Rail Division].
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011 - 2014 [Rail Division] 1 (the Agreement). The application was made by VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks approval of variations to pay rates and allowances included in the Agreement. Pursuant to section 209 of the Act, the variation was made on 14 November 2013. The particulars of the variation are attached to this decision at Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[5] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 17 January 2014.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A:
1 AE891526
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE891526 PR546963>
- AGLC
- VEC Civil Engineering Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 474
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 474
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed changes met the criteria for a variation under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically considering whether the changes were in the interests of the employees and the employer. The Commission also needed to assess whether the application process was fair and whether the proposed changes complied with relevant industrial laws. Additionally, the Commission had to consider the potential impact of the variations on the employees' conditions and the broader industrial relations environment.
The Commission found that the proposed variations were in the interests of both the employees and the employer, and that the application process was fair. It was determined that the changes aligned with the objectives of the Fair Work Act, promoting productivity, efficiency, and flexibility in the workplace. The Commission concluded that the variations would not adversely affect the employees' conditions and were consistent with broader industrial relations principles. Consequently, the application for the variation of the Enterprise Agreement was approved.
The final orders included the approval of the proposed variations to the Enterprise Agreement 2011-2014 for the Rail Division, effective from the date of the decision. The changes, which included adjustments to wages, hours of work, and other employment terms, were to be implemented as per the terms outlined in the decision. The employees and the employer were directed to adhere to the new conditions as set out in the varied agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.