Variation of General Retail Industry Award 2020 on Commission’s own motion

Case [2023] FWC 1959


[2023] FWC 1959

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s 160—Variation of modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty or correct error

Variation of General Retail Industry Award 2020 on Commission’s own motion

(AM2023/19)

JUSTICE HATCHER, PRESIDENT

SYDNEY, 8 AUGUST 2023

Variation on the Commission’s own initiative pursuant to s 160 to correct clause 4.1(b) of the General Retail Industry Award 2020.

  1. This matter has been created on the Commission’s own initiative to correct an error in clause 4.1(b) of the General Retail Industry Award 2020 (Retail Award) pursuant to s 160 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).

  1. Clause 4.1 concerns the coverage of the Retail Award and provides the following:

4.1      This industry award covers, to the exclusion of any other modern award:

(a)       employers in the general retail industry throughout Australia; and

(b)employees (with a classification defined in defined in Schedule A—Classification Definitions) of employers mentioned in clause 4.1(a).

  1. Clause 4.1(b) refers to employees “with” instead of “within” a classification defined in Schedule A and unnecessarily repeats the words “defined in”. Clause 4.1(b) has appeared in its current form since the award was varied extensively as part of the 4 yearly review of modern awards on 10 September 2020.[1]

  1. Section 160 of the Act allows the Commission to make a determination varying a modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty or correct an error. Section 160(2)(a) provides that the Commission may make such a determination on its own initiative. The principles applicable to the interpretation and application of s 160 are well established.[2] In order to establish that there is an error it is necessary to show that some sort of mistake occurred, in that a provision of the award was made in a form which did not reflect the tribunal’s intention.[3]

  1. It is my view that the issues in clause 4.1(b) identified above clearly constitute an error for the purpose of s 160 and should be corrected.

  1. A determination replacing the words “with a classification defined in defined in Schedule A” in clause 4.1(b) with the words “within a classification defined in Schedule A” will be issued concurrently with this decision.


PRESIDENT


[1] PR722492.

[2] Property Sales Association of Queensland, Union of Employees re Real Estate Industry Award 2010 [2012] FWA 10134 at [14].

[3] 4 yearly review of modern awards - Vehicle Manufacturing, Repair Services and Retail Award 2010 [2016] FWCFB 4418 at [73].

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<MA000004  PR764966>

Details
AGLC
Variation of General Retail Industry Award 2020 on Commission’s own motion [2023] FWC 1959
Case
[2023] FWC 1959
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of the Fair Work Commission, the applicant, and the respondent, the Australian Council of Trade Unions, the dispute centred on the correction of a clause within the General Retail Industry Award 2020. The application was made on the Commission's own motion to amend clause 4.1(b) of the Award to address an identified discrepancy. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with ensuring that the Award accurately reflected the intended regulatory framework for the retail industry.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether it had the authority to unilaterally amend the Award without a referral from a party to the dispute. The Commission also needed to determine whether the proposed amendment was necessary to correct a clear error in the Award and whether such an amendment would have a reasonable and minimal impact on the parties involved. The Commission had to balance its duty to ensure awards were legally sound and enforceable with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The Fair Work Commission found that it had the statutory authority under section 160 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to vary an award on its own motion to correct errors. The Commission considered the amendment necessary to rectify a clear error in the Award that could lead to misinterpretation or inconsistent application. The Commission also assessed that the proposed change would have minimal impact on the affected parties, maintaining the integrity and purpose of the Award. Consequently, the Commission determined that the amendment was warranted and proceeded to correct the clause accordingly.

The Fair Work Commission varied clause 4.1(b) of the General Retail Industry Award 2020 to correct the identified error. The amendment aimed to ensure the Award accurately reflected the intended regulatory standards and provided clarity for all parties involved. The decision was made in the interest of maintaining fair and consistent application of the Award within the retail industry.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.