Vanguard and Trustee in Bankruptcy For v Vanguard
Case
•
[2010] FamCA 989
•27 OCTOBER 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Vanguard and Trustee in Bankruptcy For v Vanguard [2010] FamCA 989
[2010] FamCA 989
27 OCTOBER 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of *Vanguard and Trustee in Bankruptcy For v Vanguard* came before Young J. The dispute involved applications concerning disclosure and discovery of documents, with the court also addressing the preparation for a defended hearing and the costs associated with the proceedings.
The court was required to determine the procedural steps necessary for the efficient conduct of the litigation, including the timing and format of applications for disclosure, the filing of affidavits, and the preparation of detailed summaries of facts and legal arguments. The court also needed to consider the attendance of counsel and solicitors and reserve the costs of the day's proceedings for later determination.
Young J ordered that all extant applications be adjourned for a one-day defended hearing on 7 February 2011. The matter was listed for case management and further mention on 17 December 2010. Specific directions were given for the filing and service of applications for disclosure or discovery, responses thereto, and further affidavits, with strict deadlines imposed on the First Respondent, Second Respondent, the wife, and the Third Respondent. Parties were also directed to prepare and file detailed summaries of relevant facts and legal arguments. The costs of and incidental to the hearing were reserved for determination on the 7 February 2011 hearing date, with parties required to address costs in their written submissions. The extempore reasons for judgment were to be transcribed and made available to all parties. It was certified that the matter reasonably required the attendance of counsel for the wife, First Respondent, and Third Respondent, and a solicitor appearing as counsel for the Second Respondent.
The court was required to determine the procedural steps necessary for the efficient conduct of the litigation, including the timing and format of applications for disclosure, the filing of affidavits, and the preparation of detailed summaries of facts and legal arguments. The court also needed to consider the attendance of counsel and solicitors and reserve the costs of the day's proceedings for later determination.
Young J ordered that all extant applications be adjourned for a one-day defended hearing on 7 February 2011. The matter was listed for case management and further mention on 17 December 2010. Specific directions were given for the filing and service of applications for disclosure or discovery, responses thereto, and further affidavits, with strict deadlines imposed on the First Respondent, Second Respondent, the wife, and the Third Respondent. Parties were also directed to prepare and file detailed summaries of relevant facts and legal arguments. The costs of and incidental to the hearing were reserved for determination on the 7 February 2011 hearing date, with parties required to address costs in their written submissions. The extempore reasons for judgment were to be transcribed and made available to all parties. It was certified that the matter reasonably required the attendance of counsel for the wife, First Respondent, and Third Respondent, and a solicitor appearing as counsel for the Second Respondent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Discovery
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0