Van Reesema v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
Case
•
[1983] FCA 213
•26 AUGUST 1983
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Ernst Abraham Siewsertsz Van Reesema v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1983] FCA 213 ((1983) 69 FLR 424)
[1983] FCA 213
26 AUGUST 1983
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal in Van Reesema v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy was brought by the bankrupt, the appellant, against the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, the respondent. The central issue was whether the appellant was discharged from bankruptcy by operation of law under section 149(2) of the relevant legislation upon the expiration of three years from the date of his bankruptcy. Additionally, the court examined whether the objection by the trustee to the discharge of the bankrupt was entered on one of the statutory grounds.
The court was required to determine if the bankrupt's automatic discharge under section 149(2) was valid, as well as whether the objection by the trustee was grounded in one of the statutory provisions. The court held that the appellant was indeed discharged by operation of law after three years from the date of bankruptcy, which was 17 September 1979. The court also found that the objection by the trustee was not entered on a valid statutory ground, leading to the conclusion that the objection was not properly entered.
In allowing the appeal, the court set aside the order of 24 November 1982, which denied the appellant's application for amendment, and instead, the application for amendment was refused. The order of 4 January 1983, which was based on the objection by the trustee, was also set aside. Instead, the court declared that the appellant was discharged from bankruptcy upon the expiration of three years from the date of his bankruptcy. This resulted in the final orders being made as per the appeal decision.
The court was required to determine if the bankrupt's automatic discharge under section 149(2) was valid, as well as whether the objection by the trustee was grounded in one of the statutory provisions. The court held that the appellant was indeed discharged by operation of law after three years from the date of bankruptcy, which was 17 September 1979. The court also found that the objection by the trustee was not entered on a valid statutory ground, leading to the conclusion that the objection was not properly entered.
In allowing the appeal, the court set aside the order of 24 November 1982, which denied the appellant's application for amendment, and instead, the application for amendment was refused. The order of 4 January 1983, which was based on the objection by the trustee, was also set aside. Instead, the court declared that the appellant was discharged from bankruptcy upon the expiration of three years from the date of his bankruptcy. This resulted in the final orders being made as per the appeal decision.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Insolvency Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Limitation Periods
-
Bankruptcy Discharge
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Frost v Sheahan [2008] FCA 1073
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Frost v Sheahan
[2008] FCA 1073
Re Bozuwa, H.J. v Ex parte Bozuwa, H.J
[1987] FCA 461
Re Bozuwa, H.J. v Ex parte Bozuwa, H.J
[1987] FCA 461
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Wharton v Official Receiver in Bankruptcy
[2001] FCA 96
Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority
[1998] HCA 28
Re Dacey, Les Ex parte Chick & Kev Distributors Pty Ltd
[1981] FCA 46
Cited Sections