Valone and Sambrook
Case
•
[2010] FamCA 428
•11 May 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Valone and Sambrook [2010] FamCA 428
[2010] FamCA 428
11 May 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter came before Murphy J concerning parenting orders for four children, T, H, N, and D. The dispute involved the living arrangements and parental responsibility for the children following the separation of their parents.
The court was required to determine the primary residence of each child, the allocation of sole parental responsibility for major long-term issues, and the specific time each parent would spend with the children. Additionally, the court needed to address issues relating to the children's names, religious upbringing, communication between parents and children, and the exchange of information regarding the children's health and education.
Murphy J ordered that all previous parenting orders be discharged. The child T was to live with the father, while the children H, N, and D were to live with the mother. Sole parental responsibility for major long-term issues was allocated to the father for T and to the mother for H, N, and D. Detailed provisions were made for the time each parent would spend with the children, including specific arrangements for weekends and school holidays, with changeovers to occur at a designated railway station without direct contact between the parents. The orders also mandated the exchange of comprehensive information regarding the children's health, education, and activities, and facilitated communication between the father and the children via Facebook, subject to review by the Independent Children's Lawyer.
The court was required to determine the primary residence of each child, the allocation of sole parental responsibility for major long-term issues, and the specific time each parent would spend with the children. Additionally, the court needed to address issues relating to the children's names, religious upbringing, communication between parents and children, and the exchange of information regarding the children's health and education.
Murphy J ordered that all previous parenting orders be discharged. The child T was to live with the father, while the children H, N, and D were to live with the mother. Sole parental responsibility for major long-term issues was allocated to the father for T and to the mother for H, N, and D. Detailed provisions were made for the time each parent would spend with the children, including specific arrangements for weekends and school holidays, with changeovers to occur at a designated railway station without direct contact between the parents. The orders also mandated the exchange of comprehensive information regarding the children's health, education, and activities, and facilitated communication between the father and the children via Facebook, subject to review by the Independent Children's Lawyer.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Valone and Sambrook [2010] FamCA 428
Most Recent Citation
Nayar & Groth (No 4) [2024] FedCFamC1F 160
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Nixon and Johanson
[2016] FCCA 70
Nayar & Groth (No 4)
[2024] FedCFamC1F 160
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Fox v Percy
[2003] HCA 22
Fox v Percy
[2003] HCA 22
Weiss & Arnold
[2010] FamCA 270