Vale & Vale

Case •

[2016] FamCA 307

•

6 May 2016
Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Vale & Vale [2016] FamCA 307 [2016] FamCA 307 6 May 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Vale & Vale*, the mother sought the discharge of the Independent Children's Lawyer (ICL) appointed in proceedings before Forrest J.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the ICL should be discharged from their role.

Forrest J dismissed the mother's application, finding no grounds to remove the ICL. The court's reasoning, though not detailed in the provided text, indicates a determination that the ICL's continued involvement was appropriate. The court ordered that the mother's application be dismissed.
Details

Key Legal Topics

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Costs

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision

5

Horner & Horner [2018] FamCA 487
Bradshaw & Bradshaw [2022] FedCFamC1F 930
Malouf & Tuma (No 2) [2024] FedCFamC2F 177
Cases Cited

2

Statutory Material Cited

1

Knibbs & Knibbs [2009] FamCA 840
Bondai & Bretton (No 2) [2010] FamCA 1237
Knibbs & Knibbs [2009] FamCA 840