| CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER | |
CITATION: | Valdivia v ISS Property Services Pty Ltd [2021] NSWPIC 392 |
| APPLICANT: | Gustavo Alfredo Soto Valdivia |
| RESPONDENT: | ISS Property Services Pty Ltd |
| MEMBER: | Kerry Haddock |
| DATE OF DECISION: | 6 October 2021 |
| CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS COMPENSATION - Claim for permanent impairment compensation as result of accepted frank injury to right knee, and as a result of nature and conditions of employment from date of injury to 18 December 2017; claim for nature and conditions disputed; applicant’s independent medical examiner opined that his condition was not a disease; consideration of Guthrie v Spence, Fletcher International Exports Pty Limited v Barrow, Mannie v Bauer Media Pty Ltd and AV v AW; Held - award for the respondent in respect of the claim for nature and conditions of employment; medical dispute remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor. |
| DETERMINATIONS MADE: | 1. That there is an award for the respondent in respect of the claim for injury as a result of the nature and conditions of employment from 20 July 2011 to 18 December 2017. 2. That the matter is remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor for assessment of permanent impairment as a result of injury to the right lower extremity (right knee) on 20 July 2011, and TEMSKI scarring. 3. That the Medical Assessor is to be provided with the following: (a) the Application to Resolve a Dispute and attachments; (b) the Reply and attachments, and (c) the Application to Admit Late Documents dated 6 September 2021 and attachments. |
- AGLC
- Valdivia v ISS Property Services Pty Ltd [2021] NSWPIC 392
- Case
- [2021] NSWPIC 392
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues the court had to address were whether Valdivia's condition constituted a disease and whether the nature and conditions of employment claim was valid. The court examined the case law in this area, including Guthrie v Spence, Fletcher International Exports Pty Limited v Barrow, Mannie v Bauer Media Pty Ltd, and AV v AW, to determine the correct interpretation of the relevant legislation. The applicant's independent medical examiner had opined that Valdivia's condition was not a disease, which became a pivotal point in the dispute.
The court found that the nature and conditions of employment claim was disputed and thus required a referral to a Medical Assessor to determine if Valdivia's condition was a disease. The court held in favor of the respondent regarding the nature and conditions of employment claim. The court also noted that the issue of whether Valdivia's condition was a disease was a medical dispute, and it remitted this matter to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor. The final orders of the court were that the claim for nature and conditions of employment was dismissed, and the medical dispute regarding the disease was remitted for further assessment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.