| [2025] FWC 81 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
v
Qantas Airways Limited
(B2025/18)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 9 JANUARY 2025 |
Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2024/1507.
This matter concerns the declaration of the result of a protected action ballot PR781541 held in matter B2024/1507 and declared on 9 December 2024.
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia has made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by the relevant protected action ballot.
Section 459(3) of the Act provides as follows:
“(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.”
The application contends that each of the relevant requirements have been met and that the period should be extended by a further 30 days.
Qantas Airways Limited has not advised the Commission of any objection to this application.
I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of the Act have been met and that the application should be granted.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 459(3) of the Act, I order that the 30 day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by the Employer be extended by a further 30 days.
This order will operate on and from 9 January 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR 783123>
- AGLC
- v Qantas Airways Limited [2025] FWC 81
- Case
- [2025] FWC 81
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the Commission was whether the application met the requirements of section 459(3) of the Act, and if so, whether the 30-day period should be extended by a further 30 days. The Commission was required to consider the terms of the Act, the circumstances of the application, and any relevant factors. The Commission noted that the application satisfied the statutory requirements for an extension, and that there were no objections from the employer.
In reaching its decision, the Commission noted that the Act provides a clear mechanism for extending the period during which industrial action may be taken if a ballot is held. Given that the application was made within the prescribed timeframe, and there were no objections from the employer, the Commission was satisfied that the application met the statutory criteria. The Commission also considered the potential impact of the extension on the employer and employees, but found no compelling reason to deny the application. The Commission concluded that the extension would be appropriate in the circumstances of this case.
Accordingly, the Commission granted the application and ordered that the 30-day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by the Employer be extended by a further 30 days. The order will operate from 9 January 2025.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.