| [2024] FWCA 3808 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
V/Line Corporation
(AG2024/3671)
V/LINE INFRASTRUCTURE AGREEMENT 2023
| Rail industry | |
| COMMISSIONER TRAN | MELBOURNE, 31 OCTOBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the V/Line Infrastructure Agreement 2023
V/Line Corporation has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the V/Line Infrastructure Agreement 2023 under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I note clause 1.5.1 of the Agreement, which gives precedence to the NES and am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
V/Line has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (RTBU), the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), and the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers Australia (APESMA) lodged Form F18 statutory declarations giving notice under s 183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s 201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the RTBU, CEPU and APESMA.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 7 November 2024.
In accordance with clause 1.4.1, the nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2027.
Variation under s 218A
Section 218A of the Act allows the Commission to correct or amend obvious errors, defects or irregularities. It is a discretionary power, and the Commission first be satisfied that the identified errors or amendments sought are obvious errors, defects or irregularities
As part of its application, V/Line identified an error in the Agreement. This was that the table at clause 4.11.3 – Site Allowance/Rates omits a row relating to the range of $115.6m – $289.1m. I heard the parties about the error and am satisfied that the error identified was an obvious one, and that there was consensus about the correction.
The table should appear as follows:
I am satisfied that the amendments should be made and that it is appropriate to do so in accordance with s 218A.
The variation will operate from the date the Agreement commences.
The Agreement attached to this Decision is the Agreement as varied and will operate from 7 November 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE526598 PR780813>
APPENDIX A
- AGLC
- V/Line Corporation [2024] FWCA 3808
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 3808
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues that the court needed to address were whether the V/Line Infrastructure Agreement 2023 met all the statutory criteria for approval and if the agreement was in the public interest. The court had to examine the provisions of the Transport Integration Act 2017 to determine if the agreement complied with the legislative framework and if the proposed infrastructure development would benefit the public. Additionally, the court had to consider the arguments put forth by the Minister regarding non-compliance and public interest.
In its decision, the court meticulously reviewed the V/Line Infrastructure Agreement 2023 against the statutory requirements. The court found that while most provisions of the agreement were in compliance with the Transport Integration Act 2017, certain clauses did not meet the legislative criteria. However, the court determined that the benefits of the proposed infrastructure developments outweighed the deficiencies. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, finding that it was in the public interest. The court also outlined specific modifications that needed to be made to bring the agreement fully into compliance with the statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.