| [2024] FWC 1747 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
United Workers' Union
v
Ecolab Pty Ltd
(B2024/836)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 2 JULY 2024 |
Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to B2024/556.
This matter concerns the declaration of the result of a protected action ballot PR775141 held in matter B2024/556 and declared on 4 June 2024.
The United Workers' Union has made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by the relevant protected action ballot.
Section 459(3) of the Act provides as follows:
“(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.”
The application contends that each of the relevant requirements have been met and that the period should be extended by a further 30 days.
Ecolab Pty Ltd has advised the Commission it has no objection to this application.
I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of the Act have been met and that the application should be granted.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 459(3) of the Act, I order that the 30 day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by the Employer be extended by a further 30 days.
This order will operate on and from 2 July 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR776647>
- AGLC
- v Ecolab Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1747
- Case
- [2024] FWC 1747
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the Commission was whether the application met the statutory requirements for an extension of the 30-day period. The Union argued that all the conditions specified in section 459(3) of the Act were satisfied, and therefore, the period should be extended by a further 30 days. Ecolab Pty Ltd, the employer, did not oppose the application. The Deputy President of the Commission, Hampton, examined the application and found that the requirements of the Act were indeed fulfilled.
The reasoning of the Commission was straightforward: the application was made within the stipulated timeframe, the 30-day period had not been extended previously, and the employer had no objections. Given these facts, the Deputy President concluded that the application should be granted. The decision to extend the 30-day period by an additional 30 days was made to ensure that the employees could take any necessary industrial action without exceeding the legal timeframe. This extension is effective from 2 July 2024.
The final orders of the Commission were that the 30-day period for the commencement of protected industrial action by eligible employees employed by Ecolab Pty Ltd be extended by a further 30 days, starting from 2 July 2024. This decision provides clarity and resolves the immediate legal issue regarding the timing of any potential industrial action by the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.