| [2025] FWC 2338 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459 - Application to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
The Australian Workers' Union
v
Alcoa Portland Aluminium Pty Ltd T/A Alcoa Portland
(B2025/1264)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 11 AUGUST 2025 |
Application to extend the 30 day period in relation to 2025/1069.
This matter concerns the declaration of the result of a protected action ballot PR788819 held in matter 2025/1069 and declared on 24 July 2025.
The The Australian Workers' Union has made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised by the relevant protected action ballot.
Section 459(3) of the Act provides as follows:
“(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.”
The application contends that each of the relevant requirements have been met and that the period should be extended by a further 30 days from the expiry of the original 30 days.
Alcoa Portland Aluminium Pty Ltd trading as Alcoa Portland has advised the Commission it has no objection to this application.
I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of the Act have been met and that the application should be granted.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 459(3) of the Act, I order that the 30 day period for the commencement of protected industrial action for eligible employees who were subject to the ballot and are employed by the Employer be extended by a further 30 days.
This order will operate on and from 23 August 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR790562>
- AGLC
- v Alcoa Portland Aluminium Pty Ltd T/A Alcoa Portland [2025] FWC 2338
- Case
- [2025] FWC 2338
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the application met the statutory requirements for an extension under section 459(3) of the Act. The Union argued that all conditions for an extension had been fulfilled, and that the 30-day period should be extended by an additional 30 days. The Commission had to determine if the Union's application satisfied the statutory criteria, particularly the requirement that the period had not been previously extended.
In considering the application, the Deputy President found that the Union had indeed met all the statutory requirements. The Commission was satisfied that the Union had applied for the extension within the permitted timeframe and that the 30-day period had not previously been extended. The Deputy President concluded that the application should be granted, and thus ordered that the 30-day period for the commencement of protected industrial action be extended by a further 30 days, effective from 23 August 2025.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.