[2013] FWCA 10034 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
USAust Management Services T/A Paul Sadler Swimland Rowville Pty Ltd
(AG2013/11539)
PAUL SADLER SWIMLAND ROWVILLE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 20 DECEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Paul Sadler Swimland Rowville Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] On 20 November 2013, USAust Management Services T/A Paul Sadler Swimland Rowville Pty Ltd (Applicant) made an application for approval of the Paul Sadler Swimland Rowville Enterprise Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] The Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s 54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 27 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE406020 PR546043>
- AGLC
- USAust Management Services T/A Paul Sadler Swimland Rowville Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 10034
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 10034
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for the mandatory terms as required by the Fair Work Act, whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the parties, and whether it satisfied the "better off overall test" to ensure employees were not disadvantaged. The Commission had to assess whether the agreement complied with the statutory provisions for enterprise agreements and whether it met the requirements for certification under the Act. These issues were crucial in determining the validity and enforceability of the proposed enterprise agreement.
In its reasoning, the Commission carefully examined the terms of the agreement, considering the mandatory provisions set out in the Fair Work Act, the negotiation process, and the impact of the agreement on the employees' terms and conditions. The Commission found that the agreement provided for the mandatory terms and was genuinely negotiated between the parties. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement met the better off overall test, ensuring that employees were not worse off by virtue of the agreement. Consequently, the Commission approved the Paul Sadler Swimland Rowville Enterprise Agreement 2013, affirming its compliance with the statutory requirements and its enforceability.
The Commission's final orders included the approval of the Paul Sadler Swimland Rowville Enterprise Agreement 2013, effective from the date of the decision. This approval allowed the agreement to be registered and enforceable, thereby regulating the employment terms and conditions for the employees of USAust Management Services. The decision provided clarity and certainty for both the employer and the employees, ensuring that the agreement would be upheld in accordance with the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.