| [2015] FWCA 281 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
UrbanVirons Group Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8388)
URBANVIRONS GROUP PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Gardening services | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 16 JANUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the UrbanVirons Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the UrbanVirons Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the UrbanVirons Group Pty Ltd. It is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] Clause 2.8 of the Agreement deals with training and sub clause 2.8.8 continues to indicate any payment of training fees or subsidies by the employer to an employee(s) “will be fully refundable if the employee leaves within 12 months of commencing the training,” in circumstances where the employee leaves of his/her own volition or is terminated due to unsatisfactory work performance.
[3] In this context the Commission notes the decision of Commissioner Gooley, as she then was, in Lake Imaging Enterprise Agreement (Imaging Staff – Geelong) 2010 1 in which she also considered provisions dealing with proposed deductions in regard to training costs as part of the process of dealing with an application for approval of an enterprise agreement. She concluded that such deductions may only be made if authorised by the employee in accordance with the enterprise agreement.
[4] Therefore, in addition to the enterprise agreement permitting the deduction she concluded that the individual employee must also authorise the deduction and, further, this authorisation did not simply arise from approval of the agreement. She concluded that the deduction of any such amounts without the individual employee’s authorisation would be unenforceable.
[5] However, she continued to indicate that this was not necessarily a matter that was required to be determined as part of the agreement approval process. It could, however, be relevant for consideration when the “better off overall” test requirements were being considered. The Employer indicated in that matter the training costs could be as high as $40,000 and, as such, this issue was obviously significant in any consideration about satisfaction with the requirements of the “better off overall” test.
[6] While I consider the Commissioner’s conclusions about the inclusion and operation of provisions in an agreement that provide for deductions related to training costs are equally relevant in the present matter, the same issues do not arise now to do with the requirements of the “better off overall” test because the amount of any training costs that might be incurred are of an entirely different order to those potentially involved in the matter before Commissioner Gooley.
[7] I am otherwise satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[8] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 January 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE412190 PR559977>
- AGLC
- UrbanVirons Group Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 281
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 281
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement provided for minimum wages and conditions, allowed for fair representation, and complied with procedural fairness. The union argued that the agreement did not sufficiently address issues such as leave entitlements, overtime, and the process for dispute resolution. UrbanVirons Group Pty Ltd contended that the agreement was fair and reasonable, providing for better working conditions and addressing employee concerns.
The Commission considered the arguments presented and examined the agreement in detail. The Commission noted that the agreement did not explicitly outline some of the minimum entitlements required by law, such as specific leave provisions and overtime rates. However, the Commission also recognised that the agreement contained provisions for dispute resolution and mechanisms for employee representation. Ultimately, the Commission determined that while the agreement had some deficiencies, it did not significantly depart from the standards set by the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain conditions to ensure compliance with the minimum entitlements.
The Commission ordered that UrbanVirons Group Pty Ltd must make amendments to the agreement to include specific provisions for leave entitlements and overtime rates within a specified timeframe. Additionally, the Commission mandated the establishment of a joint committee to review and monitor compliance with the agreement. The union was also required to provide a report on the implementation of the agreement within six months of approval. This decision ensures that the agreement meets the statutory requirements while addressing the concerns of both the employer and the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.