| [2024] FWCA 4420 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Urapuntja Health Service Aboriginal Corporation
(AG2024/4349)
URAPUNTJA HEALTH SERVICE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Health and welfare services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 11 DECEMBER 2024 |
Application for approval of the Urapuntja Health Service Enterprise Agreement 2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Urapuntja Health Service Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Urapuntja Health Service Aboriginal Corporation (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Applicant has provided a written undertaking (Annexure A). In accordance with s.190(4) of the Act the views of the bargaining representatives for the agreement were sought in relation to the undertaking. I am satisfied that the undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertaking will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Subject to the undertaking referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as is relevant to this application for approval has been met. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I note that Clause 5.4 of the Agreement provides that to the extent of any inconsistency between the agreement and the National Employment Standards (NES), the terms of the agreement apply only to the extent that the effect of these terms are not detrimental to an employee in any respect when compared to the NES.
The United Workers Union (UWU) and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation NT Branch (ANMF) lodged Form F18 statutory declarations giving notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the UWU and the ANMF.
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 18 December 2028.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE527178 PR782324>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Urapuntja Health Service Aboriginal Corporation [2024] FWCA 4420
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 4420
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement provided for terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable, and whether it had been genuinely negotiated between the parties. The Corporation argued that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and was fair and reasonable given the unique circumstances of providing health services in a remote location. The dissenting employees contended that certain terms did not adequately reflect their needs and were not fairly negotiated.
The Commission found that the Urapuntja Health Service Aboriginal Corporation had demonstrated a good faith effort in negotiating the agreement, taking into account the specific challenges of operating in a remote area. The Commission noted the Corporation’s efforts to consult with employees and consider their feedback during the negotiation process. While some concerns were raised by the dissenting employees, the Commission determined that the overall terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable. The agreement was approved on the basis that it provided for appropriate terms and conditions that were negotiated in good faith and were fair and reasonable, taking into account the unique circumstances of the health service.
The Commission ordered that the 2024 Enterprise Agreement for the Urapuntja Health Service Aboriginal Corporation be approved, with the understanding that any unresolved issues would be subject to further negotiation or review as required. This decision underscores the importance of considering the specific operational context when assessing the fairness and reasonableness of enterprise agreements in unique employment settings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.