Upside Property Group Pty Ltd v Tekin
Case
•
[2017] NSWCA 336
•18 December 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Upside Property Group Pty Ltd v Tekin [2017] NSWCA 336
[2017] NSWCA 336
18 December 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Upside Property Group Pty Ltd (the vendor) and Tekin (the purchaser) were parties to a contract for the sale of development land. The vendor repudiated the contract, and the purchaser elected to terminate and commenced an action for damages for loss of bargain. The appeal concerned whether the purchaser had satisfied the requirement of being not substantially incapacitated from performance at the time of termination, and whether the primary judge had erred in formulating this test. A further issue was whether the purchaser was required to prove on the balance of probabilities that it would have proceeded to completion but for the repudiation. The appeal was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the primary judge had correctly applied the legal principles relating to anticipatory breach of a contract for sale. Specifically, the court had to consider the purchaser's obligation to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform its obligations under the contract at the time of termination, and the standard of proof required for this demonstration. The court also considered whether the primary judge had erred in the weight given to evidence of informal and unaccepted offers concerning the valuation of the development land.
The Court of Appeal held that the primary judge had not erred in formulating the test for readiness and willingness, nor in concluding that the purchaser had satisfied this requirement. The court affirmed that a purchaser need not prove on the balance of probabilities that it would have completed the purchase but for the vendor's repudiation; rather, it is sufficient to show that the purchaser was not substantially incapacitated from performing its obligations. Regarding the valuation evidence, the court found no error in the primary judge’s assessment of the weight to be given to informal offers.
The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the primary judge had correctly applied the legal principles relating to anticipatory breach of a contract for sale. Specifically, the court had to consider the purchaser's obligation to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform its obligations under the contract at the time of termination, and the standard of proof required for this demonstration. The court also considered whether the primary judge had erred in the weight given to evidence of informal and unaccepted offers concerning the valuation of the development land.
The Court of Appeal held that the primary judge had not erred in formulating the test for readiness and willingness, nor in concluding that the purchaser had satisfied this requirement. The court affirmed that a purchaser need not prove on the balance of probabilities that it would have completed the purchase but for the vendor's repudiation; rather, it is sufficient to show that the purchaser was not substantially incapacitated from performing its obligations. Regarding the valuation evidence, the court found no error in the primary judge’s assessment of the weight to be given to informal offers.
The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Contract Law
-
Property Law
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach
-
Damages
-
Reliance
-
Offer and Acceptance
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Headway Global Pty Ltd v Golden Seeds Education Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 1197
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Interslice Pty Ltd v CCA Investments - Bass Hill Pty Ltd
[2025] NSWCA 175
Lewington v Dulyakarn
[2025] NSWSC 635
Lewington v Dulyakarn
[2025] NSWSC 635
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
2
Sharjade Pty Ltd v Commonwealth
[2009] NSWCA 373
Sharjade Pty Ltd v Commonwealth
[2009] NSWCA 373
Sharjade Pty Ltd v Commonwealth
[2009] NSWCA 373