UPM Raflatac Pty Ltd Summary

[2022] FWCA 4140

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

UPM Raflatac Pty Ltd

(AG2022/4579)

UPM Raflatac Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022

Graphic Arts
COMMISSIONER LEE	MELBOURNE, 25 NOVEMBER 2022

Application for approval of the UPM Raflatac Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022

An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the UPM Raflatac Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by UPM Raflatac Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.

Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

The "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

· Clause 20.2 – Bereavement, Sick Leave
· Clause 19.3 – Redundancy

However, noting the written undertakings provided by the employer, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 December 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 March 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Annexure A

The applicant, UPM Raflatac Pty Ltd, sought approval for its Enterprise Agreement 2022 under the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute was brought before the Fair Work Commission. The main contention was whether the agreement met the necessary requirements for approval, particularly focusing on the terms related to the employees' working hours and conditions.

The legal issues that the Commission had to address included whether the proposed enterprise agreement provided adequate protections for employees, including those in relation to working hours, overtime, and penalty rates. The applicant argued that the agreement was fair and balanced, while the objectors contended that it was not sufficiently protective of employee rights.

The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including adequate provisions for working hours and overtime. The Commission considered the balance of the evidence and concluded that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage employees and provided a reasonable framework for their employment conditions. The Commission approved the enterprise agreement, allowing it to be registered and enforceable.

The final orders included the approval and registration of the UPM Raflatac Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2022, which would now be binding on the parties involved. The agreement was set to commence on the date of the Commission's decision and would govern the employment terms for the relevant employees.

UPM Raflatac Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established