UNIVERSAL TRADE PTY LTD (Migration)
Case
•
[2023] AATA 3713
•26 October 2023
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
UNIVERSAL TRADE PTY LTD (Migration) [2023] AATA 3713
[2023] AATA 3713
26 October 2023
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application for review of a decision to refuse a nomination made by Universal Trade Pty Ltd for a Sales and Marketing Manager position under the Direct Entry stream. The applicant's agent sought to have the refusal decision set aside.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether the nominated position met the requirements of regulation 5.19 of the Migration Regulations 1994, specifically whether there was a genuine need for the nominated person to be employed in the position and whether the position could not be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident. The Tribunal also considered the weight to be given to advice from a Regional Certifying Body.
The Tribunal found that while many of the requirements of regulation 5.19 were met, it was not satisfied that the criteria under subregulations 5.19(9)(d) (genuine need for the nominated person) and 5.19(9)(e) (employment for at least 2 years) were satisfied. The Tribunal noted that the nominator had not demonstrated a genuine need for a high-level Sales and Marketing Manager and that the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the position could not be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident.
Consequently, the Tribunal was not satisfied that the applicant met the requirements of regulation 5.19 as a whole. Accordingly, the Tribunal affirmed the decision under review to refuse the nomination.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether the nominated position met the requirements of regulation 5.19 of the Migration Regulations 1994, specifically whether there was a genuine need for the nominated person to be employed in the position and whether the position could not be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident. The Tribunal also considered the weight to be given to advice from a Regional Certifying Body.
The Tribunal found that while many of the requirements of regulation 5.19 were met, it was not satisfied that the criteria under subregulations 5.19(9)(d) (genuine need for the nominated person) and 5.19(9)(e) (employment for at least 2 years) were satisfied. The Tribunal noted that the nominator had not demonstrated a genuine need for a high-level Sales and Marketing Manager and that the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the position could not be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident.
Consequently, the Tribunal was not satisfied that the applicant met the requirements of regulation 5.19 as a whole. Accordingly, the Tribunal affirmed the decision under review to refuse the nomination.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0