Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1272


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1272
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 29 May 2017
Date of orders: 31 May 2017
Decision date: 31 May 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Morris C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council(Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Ms J Reid (Applicant)

  Solicitors:
Ms R Fleming
Swaab Attorneys (Applicant)
Mr D Loether
Bartier Perry (Respondent)
File Number(s): 202071/2016
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The Applicant is granted leave to further amend Development Application No. JRPP-16-03309 (previously amended by the Court on 7 March 2017) and to rely upon the following amended plans and documents:

Drawing No.

Drawing Name

Prepared by

Date

DA LOT 1-05, Rev 5

Ground Plan

The Bathla Group

25 November 2016

DA LOT 2A-23, Rev 7

Ground Plan & Plan Lvl 1

The Bathla Group

5 May 2017

DA LOT 2A-26, Rev 6

Elevations

The Bathla Group

5 May 2017

DA LOT 2A-27, Rev 5

Elevations

The Bathla Group

5 May 2017

DA LOT 2B-38

Ground Plan

The Bathla Group

10 May 2017

PS01-A000, Rev B

Cover Sheet

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-A050, Rev A

Development Overview Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-A100, Rev A

Survey Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-B300, Rev A

Sediment and Erosion Control Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-B310, Rev A

Sediment and Erosion Control Details

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-B320, Rev A

Demolition Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-C500, Rev A

Earthworks Analysis Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-C600, Rev A

Earthworks Site Section

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D100, Rev A

Roadworks Feature Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D200, Rev A

Road Longitudinal Sections Sheet 1 of 2

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D205, Rev A

Road Longitudinal Sections Sheet 2 of 2

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D300, Rev A

Road Intersection Sheet 1 of 2

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D305, Rev A

Road Intersection Sheet 2 of 2

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D500, Rev A

Road 1 Cross Sections Sheet 1 of 5

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D505, Rev A

Road 2 Cross Sections Sheet 2 of 5

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D510, Rev A

Road 3 Cross Sections Sheet 3 of 5

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D515, Rev A

Road 4 Cross Sections Sheet 4 of 5

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-D520, Rev A

Typical Road Cross Sections Sheet 5 of 5

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E100, Rev B

Drainage Layout Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E200, Rev B

OSD Tank 1B Plan & Details

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E202, Rev B

OSD Tank1B Details

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E204, Rev B

Water Quality Tank Details

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E206, Rev B

OSD Tank 4 Plan & Details

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E208, Rev B

OSD Tank 2B Plan & Details

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E210, Rev B

OSD Tank 2B Details

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E300, Rev B

Drainage Longitudinal Sections – Minor (5Yr ARI) (Sheet 01)

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E305, Rev B

Drainage Longitudinal Sections – Minor (5Yr ARI) (Sheet 02)

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E310, Rev B

Drainage Longitudinal Sections – Minor (5Yr ARI) (Sheet 03)

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E400, Rev B

Drainage Catchment Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E500, Rev A

Drainage Hydraulic Results

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

3 May 2017

PS01-E510, Rev A

Drainage Hydraulic Results

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

3 May 2017

PS01-E600, Rev A

OSD Catchment Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

3 May 2017

PS01-E610, Rev B

OSD Catchment Model & Results

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-E700, Rev A

Water Quality Catchment Plan, Model & Results

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-G200, Rev A

Retaining Wall Details

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-G210, Rev A

Retaining Wall Longitudinal Sections

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-G410, Rev A

Pavement Details

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-G400, Rev A

Pavement Plan

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

18 May 2017

PS01-ZZ00, Rev A

General Notes (Sheet 1)

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

3 May 2017

PS01-ZZ01, Rev A

General Notes (Sheet 2)

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

3 May 2017

PS01-ZZ02, Rev A

General Notes (Sheet 3)

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

3 May 2017

PS01-ZZ03, Rev A

General Notes (Sheet 4)

Martens & Associates Pty Ltd

3 May 2017

  1. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs under section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed;

  2. The Clause 4.6 Exception, dated October 2016 for a variation to the maximum height of buildings development standard, is upheld.

  3. Development Application No. JRPP-16-03309 (as amended) for the consolidation of 3 allotments (Lots 4, 3 and 2 in Deposited Plan 1206952) and the development of the super lot comprising 64 residential flat building units on Lot 1, 62 residential flat building units on Lot 2A, 114 residential flat building units on Lot 2B, 5 Torrens title lots on Lot 3 and 9 Torrens title lots on Lot 4, with construction of associated private and public roads, stormwater drainage and tree removal on land known as 143, 149 and 155 South Street, Marsden Park, be approved subject to the conditions at Annexure A.

…………….

Commissioner Morris

Annexure A (C - Slip Rule)

Amendments

16 July 2018 - Pursuant to UCPR 36.17, the slip rule, amend the judgment made on 31 May 2017 by substituting the attached amended conditions in lieu of those attached to the orders made on 31 May 2018.

Details
AGLC
Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1272
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1272
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Universal Property Group Pty Ltd sought a declaration that a decision by Blacktown City Council was unlawful, void and of no effect, as well as an order for the Council to pay compensation. The dispute arose out of the alleged improper exercise of planning powers by the Council. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Land and Environment Division. The primary issue before the Court was whether the Council had the power to make a decision that resulted in the Plaintiff having to demolish a building it had lawfully constructed. The Court considered whether the decision was within the Council's statutory powers and if it had acted in accordance with the relevant planning legislation.

In considering these issues, the Court reviewed the statutory framework within which the Council was operating, the relevant planning legislation, and the applicable common law principles. The Court found that the Council did have the power to make the decision in question, but had not exercised that power in accordance with the requirements of the relevant legislation. The Court concluded that the decision was therefore unlawful and void. Given this finding, the Court also determined that the Plaintiff was entitled to compensation for the costs incurred in demolishing the building. The Court ordered that the Council pay compensation to the Plaintiff and declared the Council's decision to be unlawful, void and of no effect.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.