Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1514


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1514
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 18 July 2018; 8 August 2018 and 5 September 2018
Date of orders: 26 September 2018
Decision date: 26 September 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Gray C
Decision:

See [5] below

Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – deferred commencement condition – application to change engineering specifications and conditions of deferred commencement - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Universal Property Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
E Fleming, Solicitor (Applicant)
L Mulligan, Solicitor (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Swaab Attorneys (Applicant)
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/144322
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an application by Universal Property Group Pty Ltd seeking to modify conditions of development consent JRPP 16-03321 granted by the Court on 6 June 2017 in proceedings no. 2016 / 278295. The Court granted consent was for subdivision of Lot 5 in DP 262886 into 8 lots (including 6 Residential Lots, 1 RE1 zoned Lot and 1 SP2 zoned Lot) including ancillary storm water and public domain landscaping works, demolition of existing structures and tree removal within and adjoining the proposed public roads, on land known as 312 South Street, Marsden Park. The application seeks to delete the deferred commencement conditions and change the hydraulic engineering specifications. Universal Property Group Pty Ltd appeals against a deemed refusal of that application by Blacktown City Council.

  2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  3. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  5. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to amend its application to:

  1. include Lot 45 DP262886 and Lot 4 DP1202472; and

  2. rely upon the following engineering plans contained at Annexure "A":

Drawing

Title

Date

Cover Sheet

Sheet Index, Locality Plan and Legend

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-02 Revision D

Overall Site Plan and General Notes

29 September 2018

SY17117-DA-03 Revision D

Engineering Plan 1 of 8

29 September 2018

SY17117-DA-04 Revision D

Engineering Plan 2 of 8

29 September 2018

SY17117-DA-05 Revision D

Engineering Plan 3 of 8

29 September 2018

SY17117-DA-06 Revision D

Engineering Plan 4 of 8

29 September 2018

SY17117-DA-07 Revision D

Engineering Plan 5 of 8

29 September 2018

SY17117C08 Revision D

Engineering Plan 6 of 8

29 September 2018

SY17117-DA-09 Revision D

Engineering Plan 7 of 8

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-10 Revision D

Engineering Plan 8 of 8

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-11 Revision D

Earthworks Plan

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-12 Revision D

Road Longitudinal Sections 1 of 3

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-13 Revision D

Road Longitudinal Sections 2 of 3

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-14 Revision D

Road Longitudinal Sections 3 of 3

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-15 Revision D

Road No. 1 Cross Sections

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-16 Revision D

Typical Road Cross Sections

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-17 Revision D

Pre Development Catchment Plan

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-18 Revision D

Water Quality and Onsite Detention Catchment Plan

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-19 Revision D

Onsite Detention Basin 1 - Plan

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-20 Revision D

Onsite Detention Basin 1 - Sections

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-21 Revision D

Onsite Detention Basin 2 – Plan and Sections

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-22 Revision D

Onsite Detention Basin 1 and 2 Details

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-23 Revision D

Basin 1 and 2 Water Quality Outlets Details (Stage 1)

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-24 Revision D

Basin 1 and 2 Water Quality Outlets Details (Stage 2)

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-25 Revision D

Calculations Sheet 1

29 September 2018

SY170117-DA-26 Revision D

Calculations Sheet 2

29 September 2018

  1. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs in the sum of $3,500.

  2. The appeal is upheld.

  3. Development Consent DA JRPP-16-03321 (as amended) approved by the Land and Environment Court Approval (Proceedings No. 2016/278295) for the subdivision of Lot 50 DP 1234732 (formally Lot 5 in DP 262886) into 8 lots including stormwater works on Lot 50 in DP 1234732, Lot 45 DP262886 and Lot 4 DP1202472 and public domain landscaping works, demolition of existing structures and tree removal is modified in accordance with the modification of conditions as set out in Annexure B.

  4. As a consequence of Order 2(d) above, Development Consent DA JRPP-16-03321 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of consent set out in Annexure C.

……………………….

Commissioner Gray

Annexure A (16.5 MB, pdf)

Annexure B (178 KB, pdf)

Annexure C (584 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1514
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1514
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case between Universal Property Group Pty Ltd and Blacktown City Council was before the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Universal Property Group, the plaintiff, sought a declaration and an injunction against Blacktown City Council, the defendant, regarding a development application for a property located in Blacktown. The plaintiff argued that the council had acted unlawfully and in bad faith in denying its development application.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the council's decision was legally sound and whether there was evidence of bad faith. Specifically, the court examined the procedural fairness of the decision-making process and whether the council had considered all relevant factors in reaching its decision. The plaintiff also contended that the council had not properly exercised its discretion under the relevant planning laws.

The court found that the council's decision-making process was procedurally fair, and the council had considered all relevant factors. It was determined that the council had not acted in bad faith and had properly exercised its discretion. The court held that the council's decision was lawful and justified. Consequently, the plaintiff's application for a declaration and an injunction was dismissed. The court ordered that Universal Property Group bear the costs of the proceeding.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [5] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.