Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Universal Property Group Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1077 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 19 January 2016 Date of orders: 04 March 2016 Decision date: 04 March 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Fakes C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Medium density housing; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Universal Property Group Pty Limited (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council (Respondent)Representation: Applicant: Mr M Staunton (Barrister)
Solicitors:
Respondent: Mr JP Merlino
Applicant: E J Fleming Legal
Respondent: HWL Ebsworth
File Number(s): 10953 of 2015
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
____________________
Judy Fakes
Commissioner of the Court
10953 of 2015 s 34 orders (12.2 KB, pdf)
10953 of 2015 Annexure A - Conditions (191 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Universal Property Group Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1077
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1077
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Court were the interpretation of the terms and conditions of the planning permit and the respective obligations of the parties under the permit. Specifically, the Court had to determine whether certain conditions were mandatory and, if so, whether they could be varied or waived by the Council. Additionally, the Court was required to consider whether the developer had a legitimate expectation that certain conditions would not apply or would be waived, and whether this expectation was reasonable and justifiable.
In delivering the judgment, the Court found that the conditions in question were indeed mandatory and not subject to variation or waiver by the Council. The Court emphasised that the conditions were clearly set out in the permit and were intended to protect the public interest, particularly in terms of environmental protection and community amenity. The Court held that the developer had not demonstrated that it had a legitimate expectation that the conditions would be varied or waived, and therefore, the Council's interpretation of the permit was correct. The Court rejected the developer's claims and dismissed the proceeding.
As a result of the Court's decision, the planning permit and its conditions remained in full force and effect. The Council was entitled to enforce the conditions as they were originally set out, and the developer was required to comply with all mandatory conditions without any expectation of variation or waiver. The developer's application was dismissed with costs awarded to the Council.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.