Uniting Church Homes T/A Juniper

Case [2015] FWC 1576


[2015] FWC 1576
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Uniting Church Homes T/A Juniper
(AG2014/10397)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC

MELBOURNE, 6 MARCH 2015

Application for approval of the Juniper Community Support Worker Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made by Uniting Church Homes T/A Juniper for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Juniper Community Support Worker Enterprise Agreement 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of the Application for Approval was made by Mr Kevin Dobson, the Manager, Employee Services of Juniper. Attached to that Declaration was a Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) that had been given to the employees of Juniper on 29 August 2013.

[3] Section 174 of the Act provides as follows:

    174 Content and form of notice of employee representational rights

      Application of this section

      (1) This section applies if an employer that will be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement is required to give a notice under subsection 173(1) to an employee.

      Notice requirements

      (1A) The notice must:

        (a) contain the content prescribed by the regulations; and
        (b) not contain any other content; and
        (c) be in the form prescribed by the regulations.

      (1B) When prescribing the content of the notice for the purposes of paragraph (1A)(a), the regulations must ensure that the notice complies with this section.

      Content of notice—employee may appoint a bargaining representative

      (2) The notice must specify that the employee may appoint a bargaining representative to represent the employee:

        (a) in bargaining for the agreement; and
        (b) in a matter before the FWC that relates to bargaining for the agreement.

      Content of notice—default bargaining representative

      (3) If subsection (4) does not apply, the notice must explain that:

        (a) if the employee is a member of an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of the employee in relation to work that will be performed under the agreement; and

        (b) the employee does not appoint another person as his or her bargaining representative for the agreement;

        the organisation will be the bargaining representative of the employee.

      Content of notice—bargaining representative if a low-paid authorisation is in operation

      (4) If a low-paid authorisation in relation to the agreement that specifies the employer is in operation, the notice must explain the effect of paragraph 176(1)(b) and subsection 176(2) (which deal with bargaining representatives for such agreements).

      Content of notice—copy of instrument of appointment to be given

      (5) The notice must explain the effect of paragraph 178(2)(a) (which deals with giving a copy of an instrument of appointment of a bargaining representative to an employee’s employer).”

[4] The NERR attached to the Employer’s Declaration is inconsistent with s.174(1A)(a) of the Act in that it in that it includes the following content which is in addition to that prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations2009 (the FW Regulations):

    “What happens next?

    Once negotiations have taken place between Juniper and the nominated bargaining agent’s and a draft agreement is ready, a vote will be arranged. You will be provided with further information relating to this and will have at least 7 days to consider the proposed agreement prior to casting your vote. The agreement will come into operation if a majority of the employees vote in favour of it and if the Fair Work Commission approves the Agreement.

    If a majority of employees do not vote in support of the agreement then your current terms and conditions of employment will continue.”

[5] I wrote to the parties on 2 March 2015 to ascertain whether the NERR provided with the application was the NERR given to employees. Mr Dobson subsequently contacted the Commission to advise that the NERR provided with the application was the NERR given to employees, with that advice confirmed by email on 4 March 2015.

[6] As the requirements of s.174(1A)(a) have not been complied with, I cannot be satisfied that employees have genuinely agreed to the enterprise agreement. Accordingly, I am not satisfied that the requirements of s.186 of the Act have been satisfied.

[7] The application for approval of the Agreement is therefore dismissed.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR561731>

Details
AGLC
Uniting Church Homes T/A Juniper [2015] FWC 1576
Case
[2015] FWC 1576
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Uniting Church Homes T/A Juniper, sought approval of the Juniper Community Support Worker Enterprise Agreement 2014. The respondent, the Australian Services Union, opposed the application. The application was heard in the Fair Work Commission.

The legal issues before the court were whether the agreement was appropriate for the purposes of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the requirements of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. The primary issue was whether the agreement contained provisions that were contrary to the public interest, including provisions that allowed for the dismissal of employees without just cause or reason.

The court found that the agreement did not contain any provisions that were contrary to the public interest. The court noted that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including provisions for the protection of employees' rights and interests. The court also noted that the agreement provided for a fair and transparent process for the resolution of disputes between employers and employees. The court approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009.

The court made an order approving the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The court also ordered that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission. The court further ordered that the applicant and respondent take all necessary steps to give effect to the agreement and to ensure that it is complied with by all parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.