| [2023] FWC 2821 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
United Workers' Union
v
Wilson Security Pty Ltd T/A Wilson Security
(B2023/1171)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT | SYDNEY, 27 OCTOBER 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Wilson Security Pty Ltd
This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (UWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Wilson Security Pty Ltd T/A Wilson Security (Wilson Security or Employer).
On 26 October 2023, the Commission was advised that Wilson Security did not, in effect, object to the Application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Nicholas Richardson, Trade Union Official, setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Wilson Security, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The ballot is to be conducted by the Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s 468A of the Act[1] and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.
For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 10 November 2023.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
An Order has been separately issued in PR767660.[3]
This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS [2023] FWC 1400.
[2] This is in effect 14 calendar days from the commencement date, as sought in the application.
[3] Questions 6 and 7 in the Draft Order submitted by the UWU are identical so Question 7 has been deleted and the balance of the questions have been renumbered.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR767661>
- AGLC
- United Workers' Union v Wilson Security Pty Ltd T/A Wilson Security [2023] FWC 2821
- Case
- [2023] FWC 2821
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court involved whether the UWU had met the statutory requirements to conduct a protected action ballot under the Fair Work Act. This included confirming that there was a notification period and that the UWU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Wilson Security. The Deputy President also had to determine an appropriate closing date for the ballot period under section 443(3)(c) of the Act.
The Deputy President determined that the UWU had satisfied all requirements for the ballot, including the notification time and the UWU’s genuine bargaining efforts. The Deputy President also set the closing date for the ballot period as 10 November 2023. This date was determined to be 14 calendar days from the commencement date, as requested by the UWU. The Deputy President noted that Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS had been approved as an eligible ballot agent and was authorised to conduct the ballot. The matter will be assigned to another member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference, where directions may be issued to ensure meaningful negotiations.
The Fair Work Commission granted the UWU’s application for a protected action ballot order. The ballot will be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd T/A CiVS and will close on 10 November 2023. A compulsory conciliation conference will be held, and the parties will be required to attend ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.