United Workers' Union v The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New South Wales T/A RSPCA New South Wales

Case [2024] FWC 3364


f_p_n_1_

[2024] FWC 3364

DECISION
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

United Workers' Union
v
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New South

Wales T/A RSPCA New South Wales

(B2024/1582)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 4 DECEMBER 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of The Royal Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals, New South Wales T/A RSPCA New South Wales

[1] This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (UWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New South Wales trading as RSPCA New South Wales (RSPCA NSW or Employer).

[2]        On 3 December 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not

object to the Application.

[3]        In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without

holding a hearing.

[4]        On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Godfrey Moase,

Director, setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with RSPCA NSW, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

[5]        The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been

approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently
is authorised to conduct the ballot.

[6]        For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date

by which voting is to close is 18 December 2024.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the

purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

[7] One of the original ballot questions in Clause 5 was amended by the Applicant following concerns raised by the Commission.

f_p_n_2_

[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and is consistent with the period sought in the application.

[2024] FWC 3364

[8]        An Order has been separately issued in PR781988.

[9]        This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the

s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR781989>

Details
AGLC
United Workers' Union v The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New South Wales T/A RSPCA New South Wales [2024] FWC 3364
Case
[2024] FWC 3364
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission considered an application by the United Workers’ Union (UWU) under Section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking a protected action ballot order concerning certain employees of The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New South Wales, trading as RSPCA New South Wales (RSPCA NSW). The application was made to enable the UWU to conduct a ballot among its members regarding potential protected industrial action. RSPCA NSW did not object to the application, which was subsequently determined on the papers without a hearing.

The legal issues that the court had to decide included whether the UWU had met the statutory requirements for a protected action ballot, specifically under Section 443 of the Fair Work Act. The court also needed to confirm that the proposed ballot agent, Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), was appropriately authorised to conduct the ballot. Additionally, the court was required to determine an appropriate date for the closure of voting to ensure compliance with the Act.

The court found that the UWU had satisfied the conditions for a ballot, as evidenced by the declaration of Godfrey Moase, Director of the UWU, confirming the union's efforts to reach an agreement with RSPCA NSW. The court also confirmed that CiVS was an approved ballot agent. The decision set the closing date for the ballot as 18 December 2024, which aligned with the period requested in the application. The court made an order for the ballot to be conducted by CiVS and scheduled a compulsory conciliation conference to be held at a later date, overseen by another member of the Commission.

The court issued an order allowing the UWU to proceed with the ballot and scheduled the conciliation conference, directing all relevant bargaining representatives to attend and negotiate in good faith. This decision ensures that the protected action ballot can proceed while also facilitating further negotiations to resolve the underlying dispute.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.