United Workers' Union v Mayne Pharma International Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWC 1895


[2024] FWC 1895

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

United Workers’ Union
v

Mayne Pharma International Pty Ltd

(B2024/908)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 19 JULY 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Mayne Pharma International Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (UWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Mayne Pharma International Pty Ltd (Mayne or Employer).

  1. I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)[1]  have each made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed enterprise agreement.

  1. On 18 July 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Tanya Champs, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Mayne, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by TrueVote Pty Ltd (TrueVote). TrueVote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 30 July 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR777155.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matters. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Respectively, B2024/907 and B2024/909.

[2] This is, in effect, 7 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR777156>

Details
AGLC
United Workers' Union v Mayne Pharma International Pty Ltd [2024] FWC 1895
Case
[2024] FWC 1895
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the United Workers' Union (UWU) applied for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Mayne Pharma International Pty Ltd (Mayne). This was done under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The proposed ballot aimed to allow employees to vote on a new enterprise agreement. Two other unions, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU), had also applied for ballot orders regarding the same agreement. Mayne did not object to the UWU's application, leading the Commission to decide on the matter without a hearing.

The primary legal issues the court had to decide were whether the UWU had fulfilled the requirements under section 443(1) of the Act and if the notification period for the proposed agreement was valid. The UWU submitted a declaration from Tanya Champs, an Organiser, which detailed their efforts to reach an agreement with Mayne. The court found that the UWU had genuinely attempted to negotiate and that all legal requirements for the ballot were met. Additionally, the Commission determined that the voting period would close on 30 July 2024.

The court concluded that the UWU had met all necessary conditions for a protected action ballot and approved the use of TrueVote Pty Ltd as the ballot agent. The decision set the closing date for the ballot at 30 July 2024, which was also the end of the ballot period. A separate order was issued to mandate a compulsory conciliation conference for the related enterprise agreement. This conference aimed to facilitate meaningful negotiations between the bargaining representatives.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.