| [2023] FWC 931 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437—Protected action
United Workers’ Union
v
GrainCorp Operations Ltd T/A GrainCorp Ltd
(B2023/364)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 20 APRIL 2023 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of GrainCorp Operations Limited
This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of GrainCorp Operations Ltd (Respondent).
On 20 April 2023, my Associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the application.
In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Christopher Bechaz of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
The Applicant also sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS (CiVS). Mr Michael M Michael, the Managing Director of CiVs has provided a statutory declaration setting out that he would carry out the functions of the protected ballot agent for CiVS, and that he has relevant experience in conducting protected action ballots. I am satisfied that CiVS is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that Mr Michael and CiVS are capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. CiVs has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and Mr Michael and CiVS are bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.
Therefore I appoint CiVS as the protected action ballot agent.
An order has been separately issued in PR761231.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR761230>
- AGLC
- United Workers' Union v GrainCorp Operations Ltd T/A GrainCorp Ltd [2023] FWC 931
- Case
- [2023] FWC 931
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the union had genuinely been trying to reach an agreement with the employer and whether the requirements of section 443(1) of the Act had been met. The Commission considered the declaration from the union representative and other material before it and was satisfied that the union had genuinely been attempting to reach an agreement and that the requirements for a ballot had been met.
The Commission appointed Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd trading as CiVS as the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. The union had proposed CiVS as the ballot agent, and GrainCorp Operations Limited did not oppose this. The Commission was satisfied that CiVS was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot and that they could ensure the secrecy and security of the votes. CiVS agreed to be the ballot agent and to comply with the Privacy Act 1998.
The final orders of the Commission included the appointment of CiVS as the protected action ballot agent and the issuance of an order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.