United Workers' Union v Crown Sydney Gaming Pty Ltd T/A Crown Sydney

Case [2025] FWC 1925


[2025] FWC 1925

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

United Workers' Union
v

Crown Sydney Gaming Pty Ltd T/A Crown Sydney

(B2025/1082)

COMMISSIONER MATHESON

SYDNEY, 4 JULY 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Crown Sydney Gaming Pty Ltd

  1. This is an application by the United Workers’ Union (UWU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Crown Sydney Gaming Pty Ltd T/A Crown Sydney (Crown or Employer).

  1. The Employer had objected to the application in the form in which it was initially made and the matter was listed for hearing on 4 July 2025. However, at the commencement of the hearing the parties indicated a willingness to have further discussions about the disputed matters relevant to the application. Following those discussions the UWU confirmed that it wished to amend the orders sought in the application and the Employer confirmed that it does not object to the order being made in that amended form.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Sajit Shakya, Lead Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the UWU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Crown, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 16 July 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR788932.

  1. This matter will be assigned to a Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


COMMISSIONER

Appearances:

Ms A van Gent of the United Workers’ Union for the Applicant.
Mr C Power of Holding Redlich for the Respondent.

Hearing details:

2025.
Sydney, online by video using Microsoft Teams.
July 4.


[1] This was the specific date sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR788931>

Details
AGLC
United Workers' Union v Crown Sydney Gaming Pty Ltd T/A Crown Sydney [2025] FWC 1925
Case
[2025] FWC 1925
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The United Workers’ Union (UWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order for certain employees of Crown Sydney Gaming Pty Ltd. The employer, Crown Sydney, objected to the initial application, but after discussions, the UWU amended its application and the employer no longer objected. Commissioner Matheson determined the matter on the papers and found that all requirements for a protected action ballot order under the Fair Work Act 2009 had been met. The ballot, to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd, a certified agent, would close on 16 July 2025. An Order was made to assign the matter to a Commission Member to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference.

The primary legal issue was whether the requirements for a protected action ballot order under the Fair Work Act 2009 had been satisfied. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the UWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Crown Sydney, if there was a notification time for the proposed agreement, and if all procedural requirements had been met. The UWU provided a declaration by its Lead Organiser, Sajit Shakya, stating that the union had been genuinely trying to reach agreement with the employer. The employer did not object to the amended application, effectively conceding that the UWU had met its obligations.

Commissioner Matheson concluded that the UWU had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with Crown Sydney and that all requirements for the ballot had been met. The declaration from the Lead Organiser, along with the employer's lack of objection to the amended application, satisfied the Commission that the UWU had fulfilled its obligations. The determination included setting the closing date for the ballot as 16 July 2025 and assigning the matter to a Commission Member for a compulsory conciliation conference.

The Fair Work Commission issued an Order granting the UWU's application for a protected action ballot order, with the ballot to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd. The Commission also determined that the ballot would close on 16 July 2025 and assigned the matter to a Member for a compulsory conciliation conference. These orders facilitate the next steps in the bargaining process, aiming to resolve the dispute between the UWU and Crown Sydney.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.